The Lunatic Syrian ‘Revolution’ Godfather Aroor

The Lunatic Syrian ‘Revolution’ Godfather Aroor.

العرعور، عراب “الثورة السورية” المجنون:

لفهم ما يواجهه السوريون، عليكم أن تتعرفوا على الشخص الذي يقود “الثورة السورية” المزعومة ضدهم، ومن أفضل من عراب هذه الثورة المزعومة برأيكم؟ الشيخ عدنان العرعور، الذي يقود الثورة عن طريق محطتيه الفضائيتين صفا ووصال التي تبث من السعودية على نفس الأقمار الصناعية عربسات ونايلسات التي حجبت بث القنوات السورية وابقت على هاتين المحطتين.

في هذا الفيديو، يدعو الشيخ عدنان العرعور الى احراق دمشق العاصمة بكل الوسائل كحرق الأشجار، الحجارة، وسكب ما تبقى من النفط والزيت (بسبب العقوبات الغربية) على الطرقات واحراقها، اغراق السجاد بالوقود واحراقه.. الى ماهنالك..
تمتعوا بمشاهدة هذا الجوكر وتذكروا كيف يعاني الشعب السوري من أتباع هذا المسخ الذين ينفذون تعليماته بحذافيرها (اضغطوا على cc للترجمة باللغة الانكليزية):

The Godfather of the Syrian ‘Revolution’ 

في ظهور ثانٍ له، نفس الشخص يجن جنونه حول الأخبار عن أن أحد أعضاء مجموعة المعارضة السورية المدعومة من تركيا والمسماة “المجلس الوطني السوري” يؤكد بأنه شاهد عناصر من مجاهدي القاعدة في مدينة حلب، يقاتلون تحت لواء بلطجية الجيش الحر المدعوم من تركيا، فيجن جنون هذا الشخص ويسعى الى التغطية على وجود عناصر ارهابية من القاعدة في الاعلام، بالرغم من أن وجودهم قد تم اثباته مرات عدة على وسائل الاعلام، المراسلين الدوليين والمراقبين:

The ‘Syrian Revolution’ Godfather Aroor Gone Mad Watch Why

كل من يقول بأن القاعدة موجودة في سوريا هو خائن – يقول عدنان العرعور، لأن القاعدة هي أحدى أفرع الجيش الحر الارهابي، الذي تحاول وسائل الاعلام بشتى الطرق تحيده واعطاء صورة على انه مكون فقط من جنود سوريين “منشقين” يقاتلون “القاعدة” ..!! اثنان من الفصائل التي يدعمها حلف شمال الأطلسي يتقاتلون فيما بينهم على الأرض السوري؟! حسنٌ، ومن سيصدق هذا؟

The Lunatic Syrian ‘Revolution’ Godfather Aroor

Tags

,,

To understand what Syrians are facing you need to know who is leading the so called Syrian ‘revolution’ against them, and who is better than the godfather of this so called revolution to give you an idea? Cleric Adnan Al Aroor, leading the ‘revolution’ through his Safa & Wisal satellite TV channels broadcasting from Saudi on the same Arabsat & Nilesat satellite channels that removed the Syrian official channels and left these..

Cleric Adnan Al Aroor in this video calls on the burning of Damascus, the capital with all means like burning trees, stones, pouring the already scarce oil & fuel due to western sanctions on the streets and burn it, wrap rugs with fuel and burn it… etc. enjoy watching this joker then remember how Syrians are suffering from the followers of this freak whom follow his instructions precisely (turn English subtitles cc on):

In a second appearance the same person goes rabid over news that one of the Turkey’s sponsored collection of Syrian oppositions known as Syrian National Council SNC members confirm he witnessed Al Qaeda fighters in Aleppo city fighting under the wing of the again Turkish FSA thugs, this guy freaks out and wants to cover the existence of Al Qaeda terrorists in the media, although their presence is more than evidenced in so many media and international reporters and observers (with English subtitles):

‘If anybody says there’s Alqaeda in Syria he’s a traitor’ – Adnan Al Aroor, because Al Qaeda is one of the branches of the so called FSA terrorists, which the western media are trying their best to alienate and give an impression it’s only composed of ‘defected’ Syrian soldiers who are ‘fighting Al Qaeda’..!! 2 NATO sponsored factions fighting each others on the Syrian land?! Yeah, right.

They fool you, they keep fooling you & they enjoy fooling you, not because they’re smart, it’s because you’re foolable.

FSA Terrorists Burn Aleppo’s Old Souq

FSA Terrorists Burn Aleppo’s Old Souq30SundaySep 2012Posted by ArabiSouri in Journalism, Media, Media, Religion, Syria, Terrorism≈ Leave a CommentTagsAleppo, Assad, Damascus, FSA, Old Souq, SyriaIf you can’t control it burn it, that’s the motto of the Turkish terrorists aka FSA thugs attacking Syrian government and people in order to further a regime change in this sovereign country for so many reasons, not least the New World Order, regional

via FSA Terrorists Burn Aleppo’s Old Souq.

FSA Terrorists Burn Aleppo’s Old Souq

Tags

,

If you can’t control it burn it, that’s the motto of the Turkish terrorists aka FSA thugs attacking Syrian government and people in order to further a regime change in this sovereign country for so many reasons, not least the New World Order, regional & international gas and oil pipelines projects, israel’s safety among many other things.

We’ve seen what Al Qaeda, a branch of the FSA terrorist group, done to the Bamiyan Buddha Statue in Afghanistan that stood 1,700 years at a 150 meters height when they under the wing of Taliban in 2001 took control of the country there.

Now, they’re in Syria fighting the culture, heritage, history, tradition and the people of this old country, which history is recorded since 12,000 years and invented the alphabet some 7,000 years ago.

The Old Souq in Aleppo, a World Heritage site registered by the UNESCO in the year 1986 is now ruins, the hundreds of shops that make the living of thousands of Aleppo merchants and their workers are burnt to earth by the savage, barbaric, medieval terrorists whom were invented, supported, financed, trained by NATO and smuggled into Syria by Turkey, a NATO’s very faithful member state.

It’s heartbreaking to see lives destroyed and a country being burnt by these mercenaries under the guise of ‘protecting Syrians’ by destroying their properties and lynching the civilians not assisting their fake revolution. Now the source of income of these merchants is in flames. It’s worth mentioning that Aleppo never witnessed any protest in support of the fake revolution, on the contrary, it’s people held several rallies in support of the Syrian state and the president Bashar Al Assad. Here’s one of them on 19 October 2011:

Now the cavemen punished Aleppo residents and of course under the help of the western mainstream media which are ready to accuse the Syrian government while these terrorists ‘were trying to put down the fire’, watch:

the real Syrian Free Press

*

Video News – 29/09/2012 – ENG

*

Video Nouvelles – 29/09/2012 – FRA

*

Al-Moallem Resumes Meetings in New York.

NEW YORK – 29/09/2012 – Deputy Prime Minister, Foreign and Expatriates Minister Walid al-Moallem, who is heading the Syrian delegation to the 67th session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York, resumed official meetings at the UN headquarter in New York.

Al-Moallem held talks with the Iranian Foreign Minister, Ali Akbar Salihi, and discussed with him the latest developments in bilateral relations and mutual cooperation in light of the outstanding relations.

The two sides also discussed means of developing cooperation and consultations in all fields and exchanged views on the mission of the UN envoy, Lakhdar Brahimi and means of backing his mission as to ensure non-interference in the Syrian affairs and launching a Syrian-led political process according to agreed-upon national principles.

Al-Moallem hailed the good offices…

View original post 347 more words

Zionists Use al Qaeda to Attack Syria

Zionists Use al Qaeda to Attack Syria.

It came as no surprise to students of Middle East history yesterday when al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri called for the ouster of Syria’s “pernicious, cancerous regime,”.  Progressive Syria has been targeted by al Qaeda in the past, and is currently under attack by Islamists from the CIA/Mossad-trained Free Syrian Army.

When al-Zawahiri headed Egyptian Islamic Jihad in 1984, Reagan’s CIA brought his mujahadeen buddy Ali Mohammed to the US where was put to work training Afghan terrorists in Brooklyn and Jersey City on weekends.  During the week he instructed US Special Forces at Fort Bragg.  In 1998 he helped bomb the US Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.  Blowback’s a bitch.

Later the CIA helped Islamic Jihad terrorists escape Egyptian justice by sending them to fight with Bosnian Muslims assigned to tear apart Yugoslavia, and with the heroin-infested Kosovo Liberation Army.  Islamists were used to murder Gaddafi and privatize the Libyan central bank for the Rothschild Cartel.

Now these creations of Western intelligence – Israel, Turkey, the GCC and NATO – are being used to attack the Assad government in Syria and to capture Syria’s central bank for the Zionist Illuminati banking cartel.

And the road to attacking Iran runs straight through Damascus.

The following article by Dr. Boris Dolgov – senior research fellow of the Centre for Arabic Studies of the Russian Institute of Oriental Studies – is the best I’ve read on the situation.  It appeared on the excellent Oriental Review website –http://orientalreview.org/

The current situation in Syria remains one of the most important components of the Middle Eastern and international policies. Using Syria’s domestic crisis and pursuing their own goals NATO, Israel, Turkey and the monarchies of the Persian Gulf are trying to undermine the Syrian regime.

Since the beginning of the crisis in Syria I have made two trips to that country as a member of international delegations in August 2011 and in January 2012. If we watch the dynamics of situation’s development over that period on the one hand we can state intensification of terrorist groups in Syria and on the other hand we see a broader people’s support of President Bashar Assad and a clear demarcation of political forces’ positions.

“Two car bombers blew themselves up outside the heavily guarded compounds of Syria’s intelligence agencies, killing at least 44 people and wounding dozens more in a brazen attack in December 23, 2011.

In the last two months Syria has seen a number of terrorist attacks. The terrorist attacked Syrian servicemen and military facilities, law enforcement agencies institutions, blasts on oil pipelines, railroads, murders and taking of hostage among peaceful citizens (In the city of Homs insurgents killed five well known scientists), arson of schools and killing of teachers (since March 2011, 900 schools have been set on fire and 30 teachers have been killed).

Terrorist attacks in Damascus became one of the bloodiest. Two of them were carried out on December 23, 2011 when cars loaded with explosives went off in front of the buildings of state security service killing 44 and injured about 150 people. On January 6, 2012 on a busy street a suicide bomber attack killed 26 and wounded 60. There were officers of the law enforcement agencies among the victims but most of the victims were occasional by-passers.

In January 2012, Damascus has a more severe look in comparison with summer of 2011. Security officers check passports on the way to the airport, asking people what country they are from. Entrances of many state institutions are protected with concrete blocks. There are check points with sand bags near the police stations which are protected by soldiers in bullet proof vests. Lifting gates which close entrances to some of the streets are also by guarded by soldiers and young people with machine guns – these are volunteers from pro-governmental youth movements. But everyday life has not drastically changed. There are no servicemen, armed vehicles or document checks in the city. Damascus is still a busy city, with no vacant seats in internet cafes and on weekends streets are crowded with family couples and young people.

After terrorist attacks in Damascus demonstrations with slogans supporting Bashar Assad and condemning terrorists were held everyday. Similar demonstrations were organized in other large cities such as Aleppo, Homs, Hama, Daraa, Deir az Zor. These demonstrations were covered by the Syrian TV. During our stay in Syria we could move around the city freely and speak with people as we liked but we did not see any single anti-governmental rally. Most of the rallies’ participants were young people.

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad waves at supporters during a public appearance in Damascus on January 11, 2012 in which he vowed to defeat a “conspiracy” against Syria.

The most massive rally which gathered tens thousands of people was held on January 1 in the center of Damascus. At that rally Bashar Assad addressed to the nation starting his speech with the words: “Brothers and sisters!” He was speaking about a thousands year long history, the need to fight terrorism and the support terrorists receive from abroad. Assad’s speech was received with real enthusiasm and there were no signs that this reaction had been staged.

The whole square (tens thousands of people) shouted a popular slogan “Allah, Syria, Bashar!” (“Allah, Syria va Bashar bas!”). On January 8, in the memory of victims of terrorist attacks in Damascus a commemoration ceremony was held in St. Cross Cathedral in Damascus. The Mufti of Syria Ahmad Badr Al-Din Hassoun, the metropolitan of the Syrian Orthodox Church and the prior of the Catholic monastery spoke at the ceremony. In their speeches they condemned “the killers and those who put weapons in their hands and sent them to Syria”. The tragedy of the mufti of Syria, whose son was killed by the members of the Islamist terrorist group after the mufti had refused to act on the side of the foreign opposition, which goal was to overthrow Bashar Assad, is a telling example in itself.

After the adoption of a new law on political parties an active process of their creation has been underway in Syria. Although formally the constitution envisaged a multiparty system and seven parties were represented in the parliament, in compliance with clause 8 the leading role belonged to the ruling Baath party. Currently there is a wide discussion in Syria about this clause. An official with the Syrian Foreign Ministry told us that in the new constitution (on which the national referendum would be held in February), this clause would be abolished if most of the public and political forces spoke for it.

In his address to the nation Bashar Assad said that the new constitution would be approved in March 2012. The parliamentary elections are to be held in May-June 2012. Along with the law on political parties new laws on general elections, local administration and mass media were adopted. In compliance with the new law in December 2011 elections to the local governments were held. But because of the threat of terrorist attacks the turnout was only 42%, which was confirmed by the Baath officials. Nevertheless, the local administrations were elected and began to work. Under the recently adopted law new mass media are being formed in addition to the current 20 TV channels, 15 radio stations and 30 newspapers.

At present there are three main trends in the Syrian patriotic opposition – democratic, liberal and left, which is mainly a communist one. The Syrian Social Nationalist Party is the most influential party among the democratic forces. It is also the oldest party which was established in 1932. As Iliah Saman, a member of the political bureau of the Syrian Social Nationalist Party said, the party’s program is more conservative in comparison with the Baath’s program. Nevertheless there are no differences of principle between the two parties. According to him, the policy of the US, France and England is the main destabilizing factor in Syria. He said that those countries were acting in the interests of Israel and had the goal to divide Syria into five state formations on the basis of religious and ethnical differences.

The liberal trend of the opposition is represented by the recently registered secular democratic social movement led by Nabil Feysal, one of the Syrian intellectuals, a writer and a translator. He is an outright opponent of the Islamic fundamentalism, supporter of the liberal democracy. His goal is to turn Syria into “Middle Eastern Denmark”.

The National Committee for the Unity of Syrian Communists is the most influential component of the left (communist) trend of the opposition within the country. Recently it has changed its name for the Popular Will Party which is headed by Qadri Jamil, a prominent Syrian economist and the professor at the Damascus University. He is the only representative of the opposition who entered the committee on the design of the new constitution. Jamil believes that the national dialogue and creation of the government of the national unity (which would include representatives of the patriotic opposition) is the only way out of the crisis. At the same time he thinks that it is necessary to remove all the politicians who are not interested in conduction of reforms from the government, to clean up the opposition from destructive factors and to suppress its radical members who tend to use violence.

The coordination committees are also significant political force which has contacts with the Popular Will Party. These committees on the one hand organize demonstrations demanding concrete reforms and better living conditions on the other hand act as self-defense units which armed people protect their districts from attacks of terrorist groups in particular from a so called Liberal Syrian Army. It should be noted that although in the beginning of protests in Syria, part of the population, including intellectuals shared the opposition discontent with the regime and supported demands on democratization now, after intensification of terrorist groups, they tend to support the regime and the reforms proposed by the government.

A telling example of terrorist crimes was the shelling of a quarter in Homs on January 11 which killed eight local residents. Giles Jacquier, a reporter with France-2 TV, became one more victim of the attack. We spoke with Jacquier shortly before his tragic death and he was convinced that people’s protests were suppressed by the authoritarian regime in Syria. He was looking for the opposition everywhere trying to make a report. On failing to find it in Damascus he moved with a group of Dutch and Swiss colleagues to Homs. But in Homs he also met people who were supporting Bashar Assad and demanding to protect them from terrorists. A group of local residents and Giles Jacquier who happened to be near came under a grenade thrower fire, which was a common thing in that district. Commenting the tragic death of the French reporter Mother Agnes Mariam, who is the prior of the St James Catholic Cathedral in Damascus, said that there is no protesting opposition in Syria but only bandits who are killing people.

Many people we contacted in Syria including independent foreign reporters told us about the information war against Syria. According to them, Qatari channel Al Jazeera, for example, in order to broadcast a report on mass anti-governmental rallies in Syria made a fake footage with the help of computer editing using dozens of atmosphere players and decoration of Syrian streets, a kind of “Hollywood village”.

As for the Syrian opposition abroad, its political part is represented by the Syrian National council with the headquarters in Istanbul. It is headed by Burhan Ghalioun, a Syrian-French political scientist at the Sorbonne University in Paris. It is quite a heterogeneous formation which comprises groups with different goals. They represent the Muslim Brotherhood and other Sunnite organizations, Kurdish separatists, Liberal-Democratic dissidents who usually reside in Europe and in the US.

The armed opposition which conducted terrorist attacks in Syria is represented by a number of groups from a military wing of the Muslim Brotherhood to the Libyan radical Islamists and Al Qaeda. According to the information we receive from our Syrian colleagues there are training camps for insurgents in Lebanon and Turkey. The officers of security services of NATO, Turkey and some Arab states are in charge for the training and armament of the insurgents, while the monarchies of the Persian Gulf provide the financing.

The future development of the situation in Syria depends in many ways on the ability of the ruling regime to consolidate public forces and conduct the announced reforms. Other priorities are the liquidation of terrorist groups and stabilization of the domestic situation. In its turn this issue is directly linked to the development of the global policies and will depend on the activities of the leading countries of NATO, Turkey, the Arab League (which sent its monitors to Syria) Russia and China.

As for Russia, it firmly declares that repetition of the “Libyan scenario” in Syria is inadmissible.”

Dean Henderson is the author of Big Oil & Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families & Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics & Terror NetworkThe Grateful Unrich: Revolution in 50 Countries and Das Kartell der Federal Reserve.  Subscriptions to his Left Hook blog are FREE at www.deanhenderson.wordpress.com

http://www.tehrantimes.com/world/101527-western-narrative-on-syria-is-crumbling-us-journalist

A U.S. journalist says the United States and its allies are taking serious steps to launch a military strike against Syria.
“We can expect to see the mechanisms at play in undermining, dividing, and destroying Syria next turned on Lebanon and Iran if and when critical mass can be reached to topple Syria’s government,” said Tony Cartalucci in a recent interview with the Tehran Times.
Cartalucci, who is based in Bangkok, Thailand, writes for different news websites including Global Research and Activist Post and is currently co-authoring a book with geopolitical analyst and photographer Nile Bowie, titled, “Subverting Syria” available through Progressive Press.
Following is the text of the interview:
Q: You’ve written on unrest in Syria extensively. The opponents of the government of President Assad claim that his government has resorted to violence and killed many protesters and civilians, while the Damascus says that certain Western countries are providing the insurgents with weapons and money. Please comment over this. 
A: The violence began from the very beginning of the so-called demonstrations. There were undoubtedly well-intentioned demonstrators in the streets. Unfortunately, many of the organizations that gathered them had very sinister intentions.
Acts of vandalism, arson, and assault were being reported by even Western news agencies by March of 2011. This, by necessity, would bring armed security forces onto the streets in any country — as was the case in Los Angeles during the 1992 riots. In LA, the protesters were more lightly armed, and the overwhelming presence of thousands of National Guard soldiers and Marines quelled the violence in days. Still government forces killed several people, and in total 53 would die in the violence.
The difference in Syria is that the unrest was designed to be sustained and increasingly violent. To introduce this increasing cycle of violence, third party groups began targeting unsuspecting protesters as well as security forces charged with minding the protesters. These “mystery gunmen,” usually firing from rooftops, were reported not only by official Syrian government reports, but also by protesters and bystanders. The goal was to radicalize protesters and justify increasing violence and its subsequent support by Western backers.
We saw the same thing happen in Bangkok, Thailand in 2010 where these “mystery gunmen” targeted both protesters and security forces from the rooftops in an attempt to spike the violence and increase the stakes. In Bangkok, as in Syria, deadly crossfire would ensue, giving opposition groups and their foreign sponsors the propaganda they needed to demonize the government, while attempting to justify an increasingly militant opposition.
Now, without a doubt, this violence has escalated to the point where combat operations are being carried out by organized foreign-backed militant groups. The U.S., Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey have all made outright admissions of supporting the funding, logistics, and arming of these militants. What is evident is that the West and the Persian Gulf States have also illegally entered Syria with “journalists” serving as embedded propagandists. What is neither admitted, nor overtly evident, but most certain, is that special operations from NATO and the Persian Gulf are on the ground inside of Syria along with agents of their respective intelligence agencies.
This tactical environment was exactly what the West was seeking, and was the goal of covert violence in early 2011, and well as the gradual increase of arms and fighters sent into the crisis.
Q: Some political commentators say attack on Syria will be a prelude to an all-out military strike against Iran. Your views. 
A: Commentators are saying this precisely because it is written in nearly 10 years of U.S. policy papers. Citing some examples, there is the 2007 Seymour Hersh piece in the New Yorker titled, “The Redirection.” Hersh’s conclusion that the U.S. was attempting to undermine Syria as a means of subsequently undermining and executing regime change in Iran wasn’t one he drew himself, it was an enumerated policy that members of the  Bush administration had relayed to him; a policy that already at the time had been set in motion.
In 2009 in the Brookings Institution’s “Which Path to Persia?” report, Syria is again mentioned as a necessary factor that must be neutralized before proceeding on to Iran. The document details the use of violent, listed-terrorist organizations to undermine Iran, namely MKO, means of provoking a war with Iran it neither wants nor will benefit from, and mitigating perceived U.S. complicity if Israel were to strike Iran. While all of these strategies, in the 2009 report, are directed against Iran, we see many of them now playing out against Syria.
With this in mind, we can expect to see the mechanisms at play in undermining, dividing, and destroying Syria next turned on Lebanon and Iran if and when critical mass can be reached to topple Syria’s government. Also, an interesting reoccurring theme in Brookings’ “Which Path to Persia?” report is how the U.S. can lure Iran into an armed conflict. The destruction of Syria seems to be a potential means of doing this, though Iran has been very careful and adept at avoiding this pitfall.
The West lacks the political capital at home and abroad to launch an attack on Iran. An attack would unify the Iranian people further, is estimated to have little chance of destroying Iran’s civil nuclear program or setting back Iran’s armed forces, and leaves open the possibility that Iran may not even retaliate — this in order to accentuate the moral depravity of an unprovoked Western act of military aggression. Without the West committing to total war, something they can neither justify, nor politically afford, Iran will continue to exist as a growing and enduring countervailing force in the Middle East.
The West is undoubtedly seeking to undermine Iran politically, socially, morally, economically, as well as destroy it militarily. Doing this however, is becoming increasingly complicated. Even the prospect of justifying an “invasion” using a catastrophic false-flag event is waning as global public awareness of such a plot grows. The bus bombing in Bulgaria that was immediately blamed on Iran and Lebanon’s Hezbollah — even before the flames were extinguished — was met globally by doubt, even indignation at the U.S. and Israel’s rushed, dubious, and politically-motivated accusations.
As the conflict in Syria drags on, regional shareholders in Western hegemony, namely the (P)GCC and Turkey, may want to begin divesting in this losing strategy and preparing to co-exist with Iran. When that begins to happen, the prospect of a successful attack or invasion of Iran will become even more unlikely.
Q: Have you noted that the recent UN report on Syria published when Kofi Annan was the UN-Arab League envoy to Syria was produced by a number of people who have certain neoconservative attitudes and were allied with the reactionary monarchies of the Persian Gulf. Who has selected these people to provide reports on Syria? 
A: Representatives of Western corporate-financier interests are pervasive throughout the United Nations. Kofi Annan himself is a trustee of the Fortune 500-funded International Crisis Group and a member of the JP Morgan International Council along with many of the very engineers of Syria’s current unrest. Likewise, a 2011 UN Human Rights Council report, and the most recent August 2012 “expert panel” report regarding Syria have been compiled by a commission headed by Karen Koning Abu Zayd, a director of the Washington-based Middle East Policy Council. Indeed, Exxon, the Saudi Bin Laden Group, former ambassadors to (P)GCC members, the CIA, the U.S. military, and combines representing the collective interests of Al Jazeera, Boeing, Chevron and many more all have representation on the board of directors next to Mrs. Abu Zayd.
These people are “selected” by the UN members that dominate its various councils — and of course the collection of corporate-financier interests that dominate each respective member. The largest corporations on Earth, emanating from Wall Street and London clearly stack initiatives with their own people, thus habitually undermining both the credibility and authority of the UN.
Clearly, not only does an immense conflict of interest exist with the appointments of Kofi Annan or Kraen Koning Abu Zayd, but immense improprieties arise with them. For the latest UN report on “war crimes” carried out by the Syrian government, we are once again treated to “interviews,” many of which were not even conducted inside of Syria, but in Geneva, Switzerland. And who was interviewed? Opponents of the government, alleged defectors, and so on.
It is not that interviews like this have no value. However, interviews alone do not make a case. They make a starting point for a real investigation, an investigation Abu Zayd’s commission failed to conduct. And because she failed to conduct a proper investigation, the result of her “interviews” is a report fit for propaganda value only; propaganda immediately capitalized on by the West for several news cycles and will be continue to be cited for dramatic effect until Abu Zayd’s next performance.
Q: What’s your viewpoint regarding the role of Iran in resolving the Syrian crisis? You have praised Iran’s initiative in hosting 30 countries in a consultative meeting over Syria. Is Iran capable of neutralizing the efforts made by the United States and its allies in isolating Syria?
A: As the conflict drags on and the West increases the cost its shareholders must pay for what appears to be a losing strategy, it will benefit these shareholders to consider divesting from Western hegemony and consider a multipolar co-existence with each other and with Iran.
Iran, by providing a forum for some 30 nations representing around half the world’s population, shows that it — contrary to Western propaganda — is not interested in unilaterally exerting its influence. By recognizing the need for reform in Syria, but recognizing the current violence is a manifestation of foreign terrorism, not rebellion, the 30-nation International Consultative Conference on Syria seeks to provide a sheltered forum for genuine parties in Syria to resolve the conflict.
In theory, this was the intention of the UN and Kofi Annan. Annan’s actions along with his affiliations attempted to undermine these efforts from the very beginning, however, and the UN has proven to be entirely compromised. Iran, by organizing this meeting, is attempting to create a true multipolar alternative to the UN in regards to Syria. Iran, Russia, and others, with true geopolitical acumen, seek non-invasive measures to solve Syria outside the UN, while the U.S. and its combine attempt to justify acts of military aggression beyond any semblance of international law.
As far as neutralizing efforts by the West to isolate Syria, it is working. The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) intends to further undermine efforts to isolate Syria in the court of public opinion and give alternative options to shareholders currently entangled in the West’s unraveling assault.
Of course, this is a good first step, but ultimately to stop the foreign subversion of Syria, the weapons, cash, and foreign fighters flowing over Syria’s borders must be stopped. Hopefully, Iran’s efforts in breaking Syria’s isolation can lead to growing international condemnation of the West’s funding of foreign terrorists, a necessary first step in implementing further measures to politically and physically block foreign intrusion.
Q: The Non-Aligned Movement summit was just concluded in Tehran and high-ranking officials from 120 member states as well as UN chief Ban Ki-moon attended the event. What’s your view regarding the efforts made by Israel and United States to undermine the summit and dissuading the world leaders and Ban Ki-moon from attending?
A: It is clear that the entire Western narrative in regards to Syria is crumbling. The use of Israel to attempt to “shame” UN chief Ban Ki-moon from attending the 2012 NAM conference smacks of desperation. The idea is to undermine both NAM and its leading members, more specifically Iran, Russia, and China, who have consistently opposed efforts to divide and destroy Syria. This too, seems to be a losing strategy for the West.
For example, the last UN General Assembly vote on Syria came with some telling results. A growing number of nations are beginning to abstain or skip votes on resolutions proposed by the West and laundered through the (P)GCC. This included India who may now be realizing the U.S. has only interests, not friends, and the destabilization Syria suffers today can easily be on any one of India’s borders as well as deep within them. Sustainable economic prosperity and progress, not to mention viable self-preservation, comes only from stability at home and abroad. Stability does not preclude reform, but requires that it is done sensibly, peacefully, and incrementally.
I believe many nations are beginning to realize that by promoting violent subversion abroad, they are further enabling its use against them at home, and are now shying away from further enabling the West’s methodology. I think the Persian Gulf states in particular are really starting to understand this in recent months.
Q: In one of your articles, you had pointed out some self-censored facts and truths which the Western mainstream media hide about Saudi Arabia, including the fact that women are not allowed to drive, the world’s foremost terrorist organization Al-Qaeda is a furtive ally of the Saudi government, the political prisoners are brutally tortured, etc. However, the United States, which constantly preaches human rights and values of Western democracy to other nations, has never protested these flagrant violations of human rights in the Arab nation. Why?
A: Corporate-financier interests in the U.S. spend an inordinate amount of money and time investing in NGOs that promote “human rights.” This is not because they believe in human rights, but because it is a convenient point of political leverage when attempting to mobilize public opinion against its geopolitical adversaries. Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Freedom House, the National Endowment for Democracy, and many more are all funded and headed by some of the most notorious advocates for war and atrocities, and contrary to what one would expect, many of these characters are card-carrying Neo-Conservatives.
Consequently, this point of political leverage is only used when geopolitical interests are in play, while an otherwise “media black-hole” forms around notorious human rights violators like Saudi Arabia who currently serves and is entwined with U.S. interests. Another good example of this is how the U.S. is leveraging “human rights” against Syria while U.S.-backed, deposed Thai PM Thaksin Shinawatra is currently on tour of the U.S. People might remember his notorious 2003 “War on Drugs” which saw over 2,800 people killed extra-judicially over the course of 90 days.
However, this doesn’t mean extensive catalogs of atrocities aren’t being compiled against the Persian Gulf states. On the contrary, just as was the case with Saddam Hussein who committed his most egregious atrocities with both U.S. support and an arsenal made possible by U.S. arms dealers, the Persian Gulf States will be retroactively convicted when, not if, the time comes.
The “human rights” racket maintained by the U.S. State Department is not only a form of political extortion, it also undermines real human rights advocacy, leading many well-intentioned people toward a false sense of security, falsely believing “someone” is watching.
The eradication of Libya’s Africans, particularly the emptying out of the entire city of Tawarga, exemplifies this better than any other recent example. Here, Fortune 500-funded Refugees International, recorded the atrocities that took place in Tawarga, and instead of using its immense influence to make it headline news, it merely published a YouTube video that garnered a few hundred views. Why? Because the militants that committed the atrocities now form the NATO-backed government in Tripoli.
The same can be said of U.S. support for state sponsorship of terrorism. These are tools clearly at their disposal and moral objections to such tactics are for public consumption only.
Q: In another article, you wrote that BBC has just received a considerable amount of money from the U.S. Congress to launch media attacks on the independent, non-aligned countries such as Iran and Cuba. What’s your viewpoint toward BBC’s and other mainstream media outlets’ coverage of Iran affairs? Isn’t their attitude toward Iran some kind of a misinformation and propaganda campaign?
A: The BBC, along with a myriad of other news agencies and pseudo-news NGOs are all underwritten and representative of the West’s corporate-financier interests. Powerful interests buying up media to control public perception is a reoccurring theme throughout the history of the printed and now broadcast word.
These corporate-financier interests, many familiar Fortune 500 companies, fund the think-tanks that produce both national policy and daily talking points for the evening news. These are disseminated to politicians for approval and to the desks of large corporate news networks to then be presented to the public. What’s worse, is that many of these news organizations share representation amongst the very think-tanks producing policy and their corresponding talking points. At face value, there are already tremendous conflicts of interest at play.
So clearly, if corporate-financier interests seek to undermine and eliminate those opposing their global geopolitical-economic hegemony, they will use the media houses they own to spread propaganda. The BBC is guilty of many very high profile incidents of outright fraud and misrepresentation, but it is their daily, and very persistent dissembling that gradually poisons the perception of Western audiences against nations like Syria and Iran.
Iran, no matter what it does in reality, will be portrayed by the West as a belligerent, irrational, and backwards threat to humanity. Increasing public awareness and alternative media’s successful challenging of the corporate-media’s monopoly has eroded the effectiveness of this propaganda. Additionally, Iran’s own very persistent efforts to counter this propaganda, not only through the skillful use of its own media organizations, but through its own actions both at home and abroad, have also helped hobble the West’s perception management.
The biggest impetus for war is public ignorance. Organizations like the BBC work ceaselessly to maintain and compound that ignorance. Nonetheless, as ignorance fades in the information age, so do the prospects of habitual warmongers.
Q: What do you think about the assassination of Iran’s nuclear scientists? The families of the victims have just filed a lawsuit against Israel’s Mossad, UK’s MI6 and America’s CIA for their possible role in the killings. What’s your viewpoint? 
A: The U.S. and Israel have tacitly admitted they were behind the assassinations. They openly admit they are training, funding, arming, and regularly deploying the Mujahedeen e-Khalq (MKO). U.S. politicians openly lobby for MKO in full-page columns bought in large U.S. papers. It would interest many Americans to know that many of these lobbyists include stalwart supporters of the so-called “War on Terror,” including Rudy Giuliani, Ed Rendell, Tom Ridge, and even former-USMC Commandant James Jones. Americans should note that their own U.S. State Department lists MKO as a foreign terrorist organization.
It would also interest Americans to know exactly why MKO is listed as a terrorist organization. It had carried out a series of terrorist attacks not only in Iran against Iranians, but there was also the attempted kidnapping of U.S. Ambassador Douglas MacArthur II, the attempted assassination of USAF Brigadier General Harold Price, the successful assassination of Lieutenant Colonel Louis Lee Hawkins, the double assassinations of Colonel Paul Shaffer and Lieutenant Colonel Jack Turner, and the successful ambush and killing of American Rockwell International employees William Cottrell, Donald Smith, and Robert Krongard.
The Brookings Institution in their 2009 report, “Which Path to Persia?” admits, “undeniably, the group has conducted terrorist attacks” including attacks on civilian targets. To this day, MKO is considered even by its own supporters in Washington, a “cult-like organization” with “totalitarian tendencies.”
And like the West’s double standards regarding human rights, its policy on state sponsorship of terrorism is determined by convenience and opportunism. In other words, the U.S. is using terrorists against its enemies while accusing its enemies, in many cases, of supporting the very militants it has armed and funded.
And indeed, had Iran assassinated U.S. citizens on U.S. soil, immediate war would break out. In fact, false-flag events running along this theme, most notably the alleged “assassination plot” against a Saudi diplomat allegedly masterminded by Iran which turned out to be yet another patsy led along by US federal agents, were tried but failed.
The MKO will continue its terrorist activities with or without a spot on the U.S. State Department’s Foreign Terrorist Organization list. It was reported in March 2012 that MKO was handed by the U.S. State Department, control a former U.S. military base in Iraq to operate out of, this being with MKO currently on the U.S. State Department’s own terror list.
It appears that laws in the U.S. and across Europe are vestiges of an age where rule-of-law, or at least a semblance of it, prevailed. Those days are over. Whether the West’s abandonment of its own rule-of-laws has created the current undermining of its global legitimacy, or its declining legitimacy allowed it to discard its own laws is debatable. What is certain is that the West’s current foreign policy and agenda is unhinged both from its own population’s approval and any sense of legitimacy.

On the road of destruction

On the road of destruction
Part one

   Syria-the cradle of civilization…Syria – the target of Zionism…Syria the magic place they are trying hard to destroy…
     In the past years we have witnessed big changes on each level of the international political or economical stage and there were enough puppets to apply the big plan and enough idiots who swallowed the change without a comment .The wave of “change” reached Syria too.I think it is a proven fact -the external influence- so I will not insist on this point.But I would like to ask questions and to analyse some facts.

Lavrov stressed,yesterday 27/09/2012, speaking in English. “We will not let him go…Not because we believe that he is indispensable. It does not matter to us who can rule Syria as long as Syria is democratic, free and comfortable to all minorities.””If Assad decides to step down, this will be his decision…We are not looking for someone who could replace him” the Russian diplomat said, adding that “personalities don’t matter.”What is the reason behind the Russian stance?What is the reason of other allies? What is the reason of most of Syrians for making such a choice?Why is the price to pay for independence so huge?Well,everyone is aware of the big lost in the Russian economy and military industry and the gate of Mediterranean,but why not accepting the change of the actors?Maybe because the option of dealing with the “opposition” was cut since the beginning ,when those based outside the borders of Syria defaced their servant attitude for the Zionists invaders?The same ones who intoxicated the “jihadists” minds with the idea that “the system” refused to fight for Golan while they were sharing bed with Israhell in hidden meetings,as their Gulf sponsors too?The “opposition” also claimed that they are not Al Qaeda ,as pictured by “the regime” but rebels fighting for freedom and later the Al Qaeda infiltrated Syria ( the Al Qaeda leader Ayman Zawahri called for “Jihad” against the Kuffer (infidels) in Syria since 2011)…WHY??? didn’t they start fighting those monsters instead sharing beds and food with them? Why did they keep fighting against the protectors of the homeland if they were not agreeing Al Qaeda?Maybe because they knew that America imposed as a payment of the huge arm influx?Is a seat in the political arena worth it? Or maybe international recognition? The Syrian fools ,with no education got stuck  in it:yes there were Syrians involved but who are they?We can observe two parts:the elite-some of the rich bastards with business in Gulf countries,Turkey or Europe who were affected by the crisis or who just wanted the aura of power …the second part are the bedouins or the villagers who would sell their mothers for money and who were given the illusion of being an important hero or a future “emir” of the targeted areas or one of the religious extremists who do not ask for payment but believing in his sick mind that slaughter is done in Allah’s name .Yes there are such believers:remember when the mujahedeen in Afganistan destroyed some of the ancient statues of Budha?America asked the “screen sheiks” and imams from Mecca to liberate fatwas against this destruction,with historical value ,and so they did.What about the slaughter of humans we witness these days?How many “screen sheiks” as Qaradawi or the monkey Araour,or worse,the sheiks of Mecca did speak against it? How many of them did you hear say:”it is haram to kill your neighbor,your partner in business?!It is “haram ” to behead humans?”.Were those monuments more important than life?
A few days ago we saw a few lunatics of the FSA saying they were wrong and they regret the choice they’ve made and they will be back with the Syrian Arab Army-I would send them straight on Israhell border and push them in front line of fire or just made them hunt their latest bed companions with slaughter habits and jihadist claims-but that is just me…one good point in it,thou:when you realize you were fooled you try to fix it…they saw the foreigners fighting against Syrians and they switched camp (again)…or is it that they realized they are on the edge and they have no chance in confronting the Syrian Arab Army?The national army that they targeted and bombed trying to make it weak?And what for?To give an advantage to the Zionist one? To accomplish the plan of the enemy who needed the Syrian army focused on internal protection while on Syrian borders the bloody bastards neighbors are preparing to invade?
Last night a TV station was airing a report from Quseir- a nest of rats feeding with Syrian blood and hiding in sewers:one of them was saying:we have no bread ,no fuel  because the Government does not allow it to enter the area…I wanted to kick the screen.Do you know why?He was downloading a truck filled with bread …an optical illusion?Or an idiot drugged on the screen:just one example of the dirt coming out from filthy minds!

to be continued these days

 

Killing of Journalist Maya Naser in Damascus possibly tied to his investigation into Turkey War Crimes.

Killing of Journalist Maya Naser in Damascus possibly tied to his investigation into Turkey War Crimes..

Killing of Journalist Maya Naser in Damascus possibly tied to his investigation into Turkey War Crimes.

Killing of Journalist Maya Naser in Damascus possibly tied to his investigation into Turkey War Crimes.

Maya NasserBy Christof Lehmann – Wednesday morning the renown journalist Maya Naser was shot dead by a sniper while he was reporting from the scene of two bomb blasts in central Damascus. Maya Naser was working for PRESS TV and Al–Alam in Damascus. The PRESS TV station chief Hussein Mortada was wounded in the event but is recovering from his injuries. Journalists are frequently targeted by the Free Syrian Army (FSA) and the variety of radical Islamist terrorist organizations which have been attracted to Syria since the onset of the attempted subversion in March 2011. The timing of the assassination indicates that Maya Naser may have been targeted because he came dangerously close to revealing serious war crimes of the Turkish government. 

Since early 2011 more than 20 journalists have been killed in Syria. In some incidents journalists have been captured, tortured and executed. In at least one incident a journalist has been shot dead by FSA troops in an attempt to scapegoat the Syrian military. Bombs exploded in buildings of Syrian Radio and TV. 

The targeting of journalists coincides with concerted efforts to deprive Syrian media from reporting on the crisis from a Syrian perspective. On the initiative of the Arab League, and in violation of international law, both Nilesat and Arabsat stopped carrying Syrian Radio and TV signals over their satellite services in June. Meanwhile, western and and western allied Arab news services continue misrepresenting facts about the crisis in Syria.

In several well documented cases, Al Jazeera employees were directly involved in provoking or organizing the violence which was than broadcasted to defame the Syrian military and government. BBC re-used a photo with victims of the war on Iraq, claiming them to be victims of Syrian military forces. CNN´s Awra Damon filed numerous false reports. Her work is documented in an exposé by Scot Creighton. (1)

Western and western allied media coverage seems to underline the NATO doctrine that absolute image control is part of every modern warfare operation. Combine this with the fact that a US Special Forces training circular from 2010 admits that the USA for the foreseeable future will predominantly be involved in irregular war (2), and NATO´s perception of the subversion in Libya in 2011 as teachable moment and model for future interventions (3) it would not be exactly alarmist to state that Syrian journalists are being systematically targeted to secure absolute image control.

Knowing what Maya Naser has been investigating during the last days of his life gives a clear indication of which images the FSA and the Turkish government want to control.

During the last days, leading up to the assassination of Maya Naser and the wounding of the Al-Alam and PRESS TV station chief in Damascus, Hussein Mortada, Maya was investigating a case which had the potential to lead to the impeachment of the Erdogan led government of Turkey and indictments for serious war crimes and human rights violations.

Earlier this month the Workers´Party – Turkey filed criminal charges for the Turkish governments support of the Free Syrian Army and related terrorist groups. Only days before his assassination, Maya Naser entered into an ad hoc investigative alliance into the alleged war crimes and human rights violation of the Turkish government with leading members of the Workers´Party Turkey, international lawyer Christopher Black, and the author of this article. 

Maya Naser could not only confirm many of the Workers´Party´s allegations against the Turkish government, he could provide the evidence.

In an correspondences to the Foreign Affairs Secretary of the Workers´Party, HarunÇakan, international lawyer Christopher Black, and the author of this article, Maya Naser confirmed that thousands of insurgents have been infiltrated into Syria via Turkey over the last few weeks. He also confirmed that some of the SAM-7 missiles which recently had been shipped from Libya, via Turkey had begun appearing in the hands of insurgents in Syria.

According to Maya Naser´s information, the bulk of these insurgents came from other Arab countries as well as Afghanistan. Turkish insurgents who had been captured or killed in Syria usually held supervisory and command positions and seemed better trained than the average insurgent. The Workers´Party – Turkey accuses the Turkish government for using the Apaydin refugee camp in Hatay to house, train and supervise FSA insurgents. (4)

Maya Naser could not only corroborate these allegations. His detailed information about the identity of some of the killed and captured insurgents could potentially result in the impeachment of the Erdogan led Turkish government.

Almost one month ago, Maya Naser wrote, ”while I was covering the military operations in Aleppo, we saw the ID documents of 13 Turkish insurgents. When checking their identities we discovered that one of the fighters was the brother of the 2003 HSBC bomber from Istanbul”.” Such information”, Maya Naser wrote, ”led us to believe that the Turkish government is sending those convicted or under suspicion of being Al-Qaeda members to fight as insurgents in Syria”.

In subsequent, personal conversations between Maya Naser and the author of the article, he reiterated that there is further evidence that corroborates the suspicion that the government of Turkey is sending prisoners who have received a death sentence and those who serve life time sentences to Syria as an opportunity to be released from prison and as a chance to clear their record.

International lawyer Christopher Black responded to Maya Naser´s information, stating that if his information was correct, then the Turkish government is committing a war crime under the Rome Statute, which forbids forced service of non-combatants in war.

According to Christopher Black it would be possible to file a complaint with the ICC against Turkey and NATO if corroborating evidence could be produced, stating that if Turkey is involved in these crimes, then its partners are equally guilty.

Two days later Maya Naser was shot by a sniper when he and his cameraman rushed to the scene of a double bomb attack in Damascus. Whether the timing of the assassination is coincidental or not it is certain that the death of Maya Naser may delay an investigation. It will not stop it.

My condolences to the family, loved ones and colleagues of Maya Naser, and wishes for a speedy recovery of Al-Alam and PRESS TV station chief Hussein Mortada.

Christof Lehmann

27.09.2012

CounterPsyOps

 

My friend and our Syrian hero Maya Naser was assassinated today & his colleague Hussein Murtada was injured by a sniper in Damascus when Maya, the reporter from PressTV & Hussein the head of Al Alam TV bureau in Syria, went to cover the explosion this morning at the Omayyad Square.

Maya escaped death a couple of weeks ago when he and his team fell in a trap by Erdogan thugs aka FSA on his way back from Aleppo, Murtada also escaped death less than 10 days ago when a shrapnel injured him.

Maya my friend, you were martyred while covering the events and conveying the truth to the world, they wanted to silence you to pass their lies among people, we vow to keep telling the truth and we promise you to keep defacing the criminals until they’re tried in a justice court and punished.

Rest in peace…

View original post 29 more words

Friends of Syria

Iran’s Press TV claimed its Damascus correspondent was killed Wednesday by a rebel sniper while reporting on bombings in the Syrian capital. Two car bombs struck the Syrian Army’s command headquarters, setting one of the buildings on fire.

­Maya Nasser, a 33 -year-old Syrian national, was killed while reporting from the scene, Press TV said. Hussein Murtada – Press TV’s Damascus bureau chief and head of the Arabic-language Al-Alam TV network – was also reportedly injured in the attack.

­

Journalists in Syria killed in spate of rebel violence

Syrian rebels have targeted or kidnapped increasing numbers of foreign journalists in recent months as a way of striking the regime of President Bashar al-Assad.­

French journalist Gilles Jacquier was killed in January by 81mm mortar fire from a rebel-held area.

On June 27, seven journalists and four security guards were killed in a rebel attack on the pro-government Al-Ikhbaria TV…

View original post 159 more words

Made by the USA Manufacturing “Failed States”

Made by the USA
Manufacturing “Failed States”

Sep 23, 2012 | By Edward S. Herman 

The United States has mastered the art of undermining its targets by fomenting domestic terrorism, and then laying the responsibility on them for the crimes sponsored by Washington itself. This method affords it the possibility both to justify military intervention and to carry it out without risk. The well-oiled scheme described here by Edward S. Herman is now being applied in Syria.

During the Vietnam War, a sign over one of the U.S. army bases read “Killing Is Our Business, and Business Is Good.” Well, it was a very good business in Vietnam (and Cambodia, Laos, and Korea as well), the number of civilian deaths running into the millions. And it has been quite respectable in the years after Vietnam. The killings have been carried out both directly and via proxies on every continent, as U.S. “national security” has required bases, garrisons, assassinations, invasions, bombing wars, and the sponsorship of killer regimes, real terror networks, and programs everywhere in response to terrorist threats and challenges to the “pitiful giant.” Jan Knippers Black pointed out years ago in her great book [1] that “national security” is a wonderfully elastic concept, expanding in accord with “what a nation, class or institution…thinks it should have,” with the result that it is those “whose wealth and power would appear to make them most secure who are, in fact, most paranoid, and who, by their frenetic attempts to ensure their security, bring on their own destruction.” (She was addressing the 1960s Brazilian threat of social democracy and its termination by a U.S.-supported counter-revolution and military dictatorship.) Add to this the search by the vested interests of the military-industrial-complex for missions to justify budget increases, and the mainstream media’s full cooperation in this search, and we have a frightening reality.

In reality, the fake-paranoid giant has had to struggle valiantly to produce more or less credible threats, especially with the fall of the “Evil Empire,” which this country had long been allegedly “containing.” Thank goodness that after relatively brief spurts of attention to narco-terrorism and then Saddam’s threatening weapons of mass destruction, Islamic terrorism came virtually out of nowhere to provide a successor threat, no doubt produced by hostility to U.S. freedoms and the Islamic world’s unwillingness to allow Israel to find a negotiating partner and peaceably settle any disputes with the Palestinians.

But in addition to maintaining the killing and associated arms business at a high level, the United States has become a large-scale manufacturer of failed states. By a failed state I mean one that has been crushed militarily or rendered unmanageable by political and/or economic destabilization and a resultant chaos and is unable (or is not permitted) for long periods to recover and take care of its citizens’ needs. Of course, the United States has been such a manufacturer for a long time, as in the cases of Haiti, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala and those Indochinese states where killing was so good. But we have seen a dramatic resurgence in more recent times, some of it more or less peaceful, as in the cases of post-Soviet Russia and several of the Eastern European states, where income declines and sharply increased mortality rates resulted from “shock therapy” and Western-assisted but partly locally organized and supported elite semi-legal grand larceny (i.e., privatization under exceptionally corrupt conditions).

But there has been a fresh stream of failed states brought about by U.S. and NATO “humanitarian intervention” and regime change, carried out more aggressively in the wake of the death of the Soviet Union (and thus the end of an important if limited force of “containment”). Humanitarian intervention in Yugoslavia has been a model, with Bosnia, Serbia and Kosovo turned into failed states, several other weaklings broken out, all of them Western clients or supplicants, plus a huge U.S. military base in Kosovo, with this package replacing one formerly independent social democratic state. This demonstration of the merits of imperial intervention set the stage for further failed-state manufacturing efforts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, Iraq, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Libya, with a similar program well advanced today in Syria and one obviously in process for some years in the Free World’s treatment of a threatening Iran, following its happy relationship with the Western-imposed Shah dictatorship.

These manufactured failures have often had common features that show them to be a product of imperial policy and the projection of imperial power. One frequent feature is the rise and/or recognition of ethnic group rebels who claim victimhood, fight their government with terroristic acts, sometimes designed to provoke a violent government response, and who regularly appeal to the imperial powers to come to their aid. Sometimes foreign mercenaries are imported to aid the rebels, and both the indigenous rebels and mercenaries are often armed, trained and given logistical support by the imperial powers. The imperial powers encourage these rebel efforts as they find them useful to justify destabilizing, bombing, and eventually overthrowing the target regime.

This process was evident throughout the period of the dismantlement of Yugoslavia and creation of the resultant set of failed states. The NATO powers wanted Yugoslavia taken apart and the Republic of Serbia, its largest and most independent component, crushed. They encouraged nationalist elements within the other Republics to rebel, and all of these recognized that NATO would support and eventually go to war for them. This made for prolonged warfare and ethnic cleansing, but did eventually succeed in the destruction of Yugoslavia and creation of the residual failed states [2]. Amusingly, Al Qaeda elements and mercenaries were imported into both Bosnia and Kosovo to help fight the target Republic (Serbia), with the knowledge and cooperation of the Clinton administration, as well as Iran [3]. Al Qaeda was also one of the constituents of the freedom fighters engaged in the Libyan campaign, and is now admitted even if a little belatedly in the New York Times to be a factor in the Syria regime-change program [4]. And, of course, it was a centerpiece in the regime change in Afghanistan and basis of the “blowback” of 9/11 (Bin Laden having been an important Saudi-US.-sponsored rebel, subsequently abandoned by those sponsors, and later attacking, demonized, and killed by them).

These programs always involve serious “atrocities management,” whereby the government under attack is accused of major acts of violence against the rebels and their supporters, and is by this process effectively demonized and set up for more massive intervention. This was very important in the Yugoslav breakup wars, and possibly even more so in Libya and Syria. The process is greatly helped by the mobilization of international agencies, which participate in the demonization by denouncing the atrocities and sometimes indicting and prosecuting the targeted villains. In the case of Yugoslavia, the UN-established International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) worked hand-in-glove with the NATO powers in setting up the Serb leadership for prosecution and justifying any action the US and NATO wanted to take. In a beautiful illustration of the process, the ICTY prosecutor indicted Milosevic in May 1999 just as NATO turned to deliberately bombing Serb civilian facilities to hasten Serbian surrender, although these were war crimes and carried out under a UN Charter violation. But they diverted world attention from the unpleasant and illegal NATO behavior to the charges against the demonized Milosevic.

Similarly, with NATO eager to attack Libya, the prosecutor at the International Criminal Court quickly indicted Muammar Gaddafi without even having conducted any independent investigation, and with an established prosecutor record of never having indicted anybody except Africans who were not Western clients. This kind of “juridical management” is invaluable to the imperial powers and feeds well into the advance of regime change and the manufacture of failed states.

There are also purportedly independent human rights groups and “democracy promotion” entities like Human Rights Watch, the International Crisis Group, and the Open Society Institute that regularly get on the imperial bandwagon by featuring the violence of the targeted regime and its leaders. This also feeds into the mainstream media, the entire set providing the moral environment for more aggressive intervention on behalf of the victims.

This is helped still further by the fact that the atrocity claims and pictures of grieving widows and refugees, the seemingly compelling evidence on atrocities, and an establishment consensus on the “responsibility to protect” the victim populations, also affect liberal and left elements in the West, causing some to join the mainstream throng in denouncing the targeted regime and demanding humanitarian intervention, and many others to lapse into silence because of confusion and an unwillingness to be accused of “supporting the dictators.” The argument of the interventionists is that while we may seem to be supporting an expanding imperialism, exceptions must be made where exceptionally bad things are happening and the home public is aroused and wants action, but we may show our progressive credentials by trying to micro-manage and contain the imperial attack, as in insisting on adherence to a no-fly zone intervention in Libya [5]

There is a good case to be made that the United States itself is a failed or failing state. It obviously has not been crushed militarily by any foreign power, but its underlying population has been hugely damaged by its own permanent war system. In this case the military elite, with its contractor, banker, political, media and intellectual allies has greatly enlarged poverty and mass distress, shriveled the public services, and impoverished the country, making it impossible for the hamstrung and compromised leadership to properly service its ordinary citizens, despite steadily rising per capita productivity and GDP. The surpluses are drained into the war system and the consumption and ownership of a small minority, who, in what Steven Pinker in The Better Angels of Our Nature calls the era of “recivilization,” are aggressively striving to go beyond mere surplus monopolization to transfers from the incomes, wealth and public claims of the great (and struggling) majority. As a failed state as well as in other ways the United States is surely an exceptional nation!

http://www.voltairenet.org/Manufacturing-Failed-StatesImage

the real Syrian Free Press

*

Path of Life Marathon in Revival of Terrorism-Struck Homs Neighborhoods.

HOMS – Homs Youth Voluntary Team organized “the Path of Life” marathon with wide official and popular participation on al-Steen Street as people started to return to their neighborhoods, particularly the neighborhoods of al-Nazehin and Ashira.

The participants, who returned to their houses as the armed forces cleared their neighborhoods of the terrorists, raised the Syrian flag, photos of President Bashar al-Assad and banners that stress adherence to national unity and rejection of terrorism and sectarianism.

Governor of Homs, Ahmad Muneir Mohammad, said that the conspirators wanted to make al-Steen Street in Homs the road to death, expressing optimism that the conspiracy will end soon.

20120924-121851.jpg

Head of Homs Youth Voluntary Team, Wahid Yazbek, said that the event aimed at gathering people around one goal of reviving life in Homs neighborhoods after restoring security and safety to them.

In turn…

View original post 151 more words

the real Syrian Free Press

*

DAMASCUS –Prime Minister, Wael al-Halqi, stressed that the crisis in Syria is in its final stage thanks to the Syrian people’s unity and the precious sacrifice being offered by the Syrian army in confrontation of terrorism.

He pointed out to the signs of international political shift towards a peaceful solution to the crisis in Syria and the calls for dialogue and national reconciliation.

During his meeting with Chairman and members of the Executive Office of the General Sports Federation on Sunday, Premier al-Halqi said “The Syrian economy is secure, and we have enough food, medicine and oil derivatives available in all Syrian provinces.”

The meeting also dealt with topics related to rehabilitating sport clubs and utilities in addition to providing supplies for arranging sport events.

They inspected the situation of some utilities and the projects invested by the Federation and means of upgrading them, as Premier al-Halqi stressed the…

View original post 41 more words

arabrevolutions

19 September 2012, 6.46am AEST
Originally posted on The Conversation.Written by Tim Anderson, a senior Lecturer (Political Economy) at University of Sydney
Sxyhythm-1347946524
A building Aleppo attacked by Free Syrian Army fighters. EPA/Sana

 

It is a paradox of our digital age that, despite an enormous supply of information, a powerful yet misleading consensus can still shape the course of international relations. Such was the case with the supposed threat from Saddam Hussein’s “weapons of mass destruction”, and such is the case with the foreign-backed “revolution” in Syria.

The “consensus” from March 2011 was that President Bashar al-Assad was a “brutal dictator”; the Syrian people had risen up against his regime as part of the Arab Spring’s democratic awakening; Assad’s minority Alawi group was repressing the majority Sunni group; and a rebel force had been formed from army defectors and outside forces were only helping them defend a civilian population.

View original post 660 more words

Al-Jaafari: UNSG 11th Report on Children and Armed Conflict Is Unprofessional and Motivated by Incitement against Syria

Al-Jaafari: UNSG 11th Report on Children and Armed Conflict Is Unprofessional and Motivated by Incitement against Syria

Sep 20, 2012

Syria dismissed the UN Secretary General’s 11th annual report on ‘Children and Armed Conflict’ as “unprofessional, dishonest and motivated by incitement” as it is aimed at harming Syria and tarnishing its reputation and the extent of its abidance by its international commitments on child protection and preventing violence against them during
armed conflicts.

Delivering Syria’s statement at an open UN Security Council session on Wednesday, Syria’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Bashar al-Jaafari, voiced deep concern over the wrong information included in the report by the outgoing UNSG Special Representative for Children and Armed Conflict, Radica Komara Swami.

“We therefore reject all the allegations brought in the report on my country Syria and denounce politicizing this important humanitarian issue which is in the first place concerned with the children of my country,” said al-Jaafari.

He decried the report as lacking the evidence and facts and depending instead on mere media-based anti-Syria claims, wishing that the report’s makers would have at least taken into consideration the Syrian government’s point of view “which we have persisted in conveying it to Komara Swami since the beginning of the events and until the end of her mandate.”

The Syrian Ambassador denounced Komara Swami’s insistence on placing the full responsibility for the acts of violence against children in Syria on the security and military authorities, lashing out at her “deliberate ignoring of the tens of other political and media reports and the testimonies of non-governmental parties which gave evidence on the armed terrorist groups’ resorting to conscripting children within their ranks and forcing them to carry arms…and carry out acts of killing and sabotage against private and public properties.”

“This is a fact not even the UN Secretary General’s report itself has been able to deny as it refers to reliable allegations on the armed groups conscripting children in their ranks,” al-Jaafari said.

He highlighted that the international investigation committee’s latest report on the situation in Syria also indicated that the armed groups conscripted children under 18 to kill and provide support in evacuating the injured and conveying messages in favor of the armed groups.

Syria’s Permanent Representative to the UN reaffirmed his country’s commitment to the Convention on the Rights of the Child and its Optional Protocol on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflicts which Syria signed since 2003, stressing that the armed groups are the ones which are committing violations against the rights of the child in Syria.

He cited also these groups’ hindering of the evacuation of the injured, patients, children and people with disabilities in some areas and keeping them as hostages, referring particularly to what happened in the city of Homs in the presence of representatives of the International Committee of the Red Cross.

He hoped that the UNSG former representative would have included in her report the acts of burning, looting and sabotaging which the foreign-funded terrorist groups carried out against 2070 schools and kindergartens and the health centers, “which are all described in details in the UNICEF reports.”

Al-Jaafari stressed in his respond to Komara Swami’s call upon the Syrian government forces to pull out of schools that schools in Syria are being used as shelters for the displaced families and not as bases for the government military forces, citing in this regard the presidential statement of the 5th meeting of the Humanitarian Forum on Syria, held under the OCHA auspices in Geneva on September 7, 2012, in which the OCHA Coordinator in Damascus clarified to Komara Swami this fact.

The Syrian Ambassador wondered at the UNSG former representative’s ignoring of the 86 documented cases of rape against the Syrian women at the camps in Turkey by the Turkish guards, referring also to the reports and documents on the so-called ‘Licit Sexual Jihad’ made lawful by some in the Arab countries and practiced at the camps in Turkey and Jordan in terms of marrying displaced Syrian girls between 14 and 16, who are given a trivial amount of money in return.

He also blasted the UN report as refraining from referring to the impacts of the illegitimate unilateral economic measures taken against Syria on the Syrian children in terms of affecting the importing of vaccines and drugs because of the difficulty of money transfer.

Al-Jaafari denounced devoting 8 paragraphs on Syria in the report while completely ignoring any reference to the suffering of the Syrian children under the yoke of the Israeli occupation in the occupied Syrian Golan in all fields of life including education, food and water, in addition to the mines which have claimed 202 children and caused permanent disabilities to 329 others.

He also denounced the ignoring of the situation of Palestinian children in the territories occupied by Israel, in which 1500 children were killed since September 29, 2000, referring also to the numbers of children who were killed in Iraq, Libya and Yemen due to the NATO military intervention.

“The Syrian government stresses its right to defending its citizens,” said the Syrian Ambassador, reiterating call upon the Security Council members to exert pressure on the Arab, regional and international countries supporting terrorism in Syria to stop arming and funding the terrorist groups based on the Security Council resolutions on combating terrorism.

He also called on the members to expose the immoral and illegal aspects of the illegitimate sanctions imposed on Syria unilaterally.

http://sana.sy/eng/22/2012/09/20/442585.htm

THE REVOSHIT PAGES BUSTED!

 THE REVOSHIT PAGES BUSTED!

SPECIAL THANKS TO:    https://www.facebook.com/FdhnakonMoo
LIES!! AGAIN !!!!!
ZIONIST’S CRIMES IN #GAZA ,#IRAQ, #AFGANISTAN,#LIBYA …POSTED AS BEING IN #SYRIA BY THE #REVOSHIT PAGES!

 

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

 

Syria&Libia: “regime censorship” and “expression freedom” – NATO’s PROPAGANDA vs Truth

(1) CNN – CIA’s News Network

(2)Robert Fish interviews Syrian Army Generals
Robert Fisk: ‘They snipe at us then run and hide in sewers’
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/robert-fisk-they-snipe-at…
Robert Fisk: ‘No power can bring down the Syrian regime’
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/fisk/robert-fisk-no-power-c…

(3) Delegazione Siro-Italiana incontra Presidente Parlamento Siriano, dr. Mahmoud
http://syrianfreepress.wordpress.com/2012/05/08/video-integrale-delegazione-s… (ITALIANO)

(4) Assad interviewed by Barbara Walters

(5) Bashar Assad interviewed by Todenhöfer, July 5th 2012

(6) Syria – Gilles Jacquier was killed by Terrorists 18-07-2012

(7) Syria: Bombs hit cars escorting ANSA correspondent, one dies
http://www.ansamed.info/ansamed/en/news/sections/generalnews/2012/06/20/Syria…
http://www.grr.rai.it/dl/grr/notizie/ContentItem-0bfe284d-d663-4cce-b45f-c1f3… (ITALIANO)

(8) Porta a Porta, “Attacco alleato alla Libia”, 21 Marzo 2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1ZH6UDRleU (ITALIANO)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1ZH6UDRleU (ITALIANO)

(9) A tu per con Yvonne De Vito
http://www.statopotenza.eu/2837/a-tu-per-tu-con-yvonne-di-vito (ITALIANO)

(10) Intervista ad Yvonne De Vito
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swg1j4X2MXg (ITALIANO)

(11) Censorship: Britain bans Press TV
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/222311.html
(12) Censorship: EU bans Addounia TV
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Addounia_TV
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:247:0017:0021…
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:247:0017:0021…

(13) US sanctions against the Syrian Arab Television and Radio Broadcasting Commission (SATRBC)
http://www.sana.sy/eng/21/2012/03/06/404553.htm
http://208.43.232.81/eng/21/2012/03/06/404553.htm

EU sanctions against General Organisation of Radio and TV (GORT):
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2012:165:0080:0082…
http://sana.sy/eng/337/2012/06/27/427931.htm

(14) Syrian SANA News Agency website is under fierce attack 07-14-2012

http://sana.sy/eng/21/2012/07/14/431380.htm

(15) JANA News
http://www.jana-news.ly
http://www.jana-news.ly/en

(16)LANA News
http://www.lana-news.ly/ar/

(17) danielnouri.org – archive of JANA articles
http://danielnouri.org/jana-news.ly/en/scat.php%3fscat=45+Quoriana+Several+Eu…

(18) NATO bombed Libyan TV — June 7, 2011
http://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2011/06/07/152275.html

(19) NATO bombed Libyan TV — July 30, 2011
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/30/us-libya-nato-idUSTRE76T0KE20110730

http://it.euronews.com/2011/07/30/libia-la-nato-bombarda-la-televisione-del-r… (ITALIANO)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQL2y9pLRbU (ITALIANO)

(20) Arab League seeks to block Libya TV channels
http://www.khaleejtimes.com/darticlen.asp?xfile=data/middleeast/2011/May/midd…

http://www.voltairenet.org/NATO-preparing-vast-disinformation
http://www.voltairenet.org/La-NATO-sta-preparando-una-grande (ITALIANO)
http://www.contropiano.org/it/esteri/item/1349-la-nato-bombarda-tripoli-la-le… (ITALIANO)

(21) Arab League Decision to Request That Arabsat and Nilesat Halt Broadcast of Syrian Channels Condemned
http://sana.sy/eng/21/2012/06/03/423057.htm

(22) Ministry of Information: Stopping Broadcast of Addounia TV on Arabsat and Nilesat Preparatory Step to Launch Misleading Campaign of False News
http://sana.sy/eng/337/2012/07/19/432432.htm

(23) Information Ministry: A Fake Channel is Using Syrian Satellite Channel Logo and May Replace Genuine Channel
http://208.43.232.81/eng/337/2012/07/20/432562.htm

Syrian people warned against ‘fake TV channel’
http://presstv.com/detail/2012/07/21/251984/syrians-warned-against-fake-tv-ch…

(24) Qatar Simulates Syria’s Public Places to Produce Fake Videos
http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=9104250858

Unfortunately this is too long for Youtube’s description video so, you can find the complete list at this link. Continua:
http://wp.me/p1DGte-22M

Real news about Syria:
News from Syria: http://syrianfreepress.wordpress.com/

The modern Ghingiz Khan and his followers

The  modern Ghingiz Khan and his followers

Is Ghingiz Khan,the Mongol , reborn and living in the body of an Wahabi leader ? This question is vibing in my mind these days watching the events of the Middle East …

Ghingiz Khan described himself at Bukhara as the “scourge of God” sent to men as a punishment for their great sins:His bewildering extent of the blood-thirsty ferocity, insatiable thirst for massacre,beheadings and devastating destruction which brought unprecedented suffering for the greater portion of the civilized world, where fleeing populations, pillaged towns and cities were wreaked as a special vengeance upon them just like those who dared to resist the modern Ghingiz, who converted rich and smiling areas into ruins and left behind the smoke of burning towns.These barbarian hordes set up a new record:in order to conquer their opposants, they pursue them, want to see their families in tears ,air fatwas which allows them to possess the daughters and wives of the locals or the reckless assassination of scholars, poets, and writers, and the destruction of libraries and colleges which bring irreparable disaster upon Muslim civilization. In Ghingiz Khan time,the sack of Baghdad was a supreme catastrophe of the world of Islam and of the Arabo-Persian civilization which had flourished so richly for many hundred years.The destruction of Baghdad, therefore, meant the extinction of learning. With it were destroyed the great libraries and unique treasures of art, philosophy, and science, accumulated through hundreds of years.

Our ancestors ,our parents tought us to learn from history…was this message misunderstood by some and taken as an example by others?

Turkey’s Syrian Misadventure

By Jeremy Salt – Ankara

Turkey’s intervention in Syria has been an act of unprecedented folly. Not since the republic was established in 1923 – not even when the military was in charge – has a Turkish government sought ‘regime change’ in another country.  In sponsoring armed groups seeking to destroy the Syrian government, the collective calling itself ‘The Friends of the Syrian People’ appears to be committing serious violations of international law. While the focus has to remain on the prime victims of their intervention, the Syrian people,  it is also the case that  more than a year later the policy has not worked for Turkey and is blowing up in the face of its architects, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu.

International Law

Article 2 (1) of the UN Charter (1945) states that the organization is based on the ‘sovereign equality of all its Members’. Article 2 (3) states that all members ‘shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security and justice are not endangered’. Article 2 (4) required all members to refrain in their international relations ‘from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state or in any manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations’. Article 2 (7) states that ‘nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisprudence of any state’. Chapter 7 of the charter grants the Security Council the right to take action but only in cases of a threat to peace, a breach of the peace or an act of aggression. ‘Peace’ here is clearly intended to mean international peace and not the disruption of domestic peace by domestic disorder.  

In 1965 the sovereign rights of the state were further affirmed in General Assembly Resolution 2131 (XX), entitled Declaration on the Inadmissibility of Intervention in the Domestic Affairs of States and the Protection of Their Independence and the Protection of Their Independence and Sovereignty, passed on December 21 by a vote of 109-0.  Three of the core principles are adumbrated below:

1. No State has the right to intervene directly or indirectly for any reason whatever in the internal and external affairs of any State. Consequently armed intervention and all other forms of interference or attempted threats against the personality of the State or against its political, economic and cultural elements are condemned.

2. No State may use or encourage the use of economic, political or any other type of measures to coerce another State in order to obtain from it the subordination of the exercise of its sovereign rights or to secure from its advantages of any kind. Also no State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State or interfere in civil strife in another State.

The fact that powerful states bully the weak and frequently violate their sovereign rights is no excuse for Turkey to do the same. The question of whether the Justice and Development Party government is violating Turkey’s own laws is another issue, already raised in the Turkish media and by opposition politicians.

Disarray

None of this would matter so much if Turkey’s policy had worked out. Bashar would have gone in a few months and the Turkish Prime Minister and his Foreign Minister would be hailed for their foresight and courage but now it is they who are on the hot plate. Bashar is still in power and the army – the foot soldiers mostly Sunni Muslims – has not broken up on sectarian lines. The armed protégés of the outside governments are steadily being contained and driven out of the towns and the cities they have infiltrated. Fighting continues but external support for the armed groups seems to be waning. The US was already losing its appetite for direct intervention under the aegis of NATO and in the wake of the murder of the US ambassador to Tripoli by the very people whom the US used as auxiliaries to destroy the Libyan Jamahiriya and its founder,    it can be ruled out altogether and not only because of fear of the Russian and Chinese reaction.  Finally the US is taking a clear look at the people likely to inherit in Syria if Assad goes and it does not like what it sees.    

The recent statement of a ‘rebel commander’ in Aleppo that 70 per cent of the population remains loyal to the government probably means that 90 to 95 per cent support the government and not just in Aleppo, where local Christians have been forming armed groups to defend themselves. It is only another strand of western involvement in Syria that politicians who wear their Christianity on their sleeve in Washington and London have completely ignored the evidence of the killing and intimidation of Syrian Christians. Only the Vatican has spoken out.   Only recently have the sponsors of the armed  groups – with the notable exceptions of Saudi Arabia and Qatar –  begun  looking askance at the savagery of the  crimes they are committing,  including the  massacre of civilians and soldiers, rape, kidnapping and the murder of anyone identified as a ‘regime loyalist’,  including  police, postal workers, university professors and journalists. In Aleppo they stood their captives against a wall and riddled them with machine gun fire. Later they ‘executed’ 20 bound and gagged Syrian soldiers. In Al Bab – near Aleppo – they murdered postal workers before pitching their bodies from the roof of their building on to the steps below. In Homs the FSA’s Faruq Brigade maintained a special squad whose job it was to cut the throats of the group’s captives. Others have their heads cut off. All of this is justified by the crimes committed or alleged to have been committed by the ‘regime’. Any lines of demarcation between these groups have all but disappeared. There is tacit cooperation between all of them. There is no reason why  any sane Syrian would want these people in their midst,  especially as many are not  even their countrymen but salafis/jihadis/takfiris – Pakistanis, Iraqis, Turks, Saudis, Chechens and Libyans – paid by Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Their role in the armed opposition has become increasingly dominant.

US Target

Syria has been in the gun sights of the US administration for decades. The country’s modern history bulges with attempts to disable it through assassination, attempts to overthrow the government, armed attack and occupation and most recently sanctions: no wonder Syria has become a byword for the mukharabat state. In the past two decades the calibration of the anti-Syrian policy has been in the hands of the neoconservatives. The Middle East was their prime target and Israel their prime beneficiary. The national security strategy announced by the George W. Bush administration was effectively a neoconservative writ for attacking other states if and when the US wanted, with Muslim countries top of the list. The rule book – beginning with the 1648 Treaty of Westphalia – was tossed out the window. After the invasion of Afghanistan the governments of seven states were set up for destruction:  Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Iran, not necessarily in that order.  Out of the ruins a new Middle East was to be born.

The strategy has  been extended to include a wide range of activities befitting a ‘hyper’ state powerful enough to operate outside the law, including ‘extra judicial’ executions and drone attacks that have killed countless numbers of civilians as well as a handful of Islamic militants in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Somalia and Yemen. Osama bin Laden could have been arrested and put on trial but was shot dead in front of his wives and children. This was not an ‘extra judicial’ execution because there is no such thing. For an execution to be legal it must have been preceded by prosecution, trial and conviction but now prosecutor, judge, jury and executioner have all been rolled into one. Osama might have been responsible for murders but he also was murdered. The use of ‘extra judicial’ execution is no more than media apologetics for crime. 

Heads of state are no more exempted from the law of the gun than anyone else but there was a time when they were removed covertly. Now it is done right out in the open. The Reagan administration’s failed attempt to murder Muammar al Qadhafi in the 1980s was finally followed by success last year. The oracular statement of Hillary Clinton in Tripoli a few days before his murder that ‘we’ are looking forward to the Libyan leader’s capture or killing was thus fulfilled. It will be remembered that she celebrated the occasion with a joke. The assassination of the US ambassador to Libya was a different matter altogether:  she said it left her heartbroken – a technical impossibility, some would say, reminiscent of the old jazz line – ‘something beats in his chest/but it’s just a pump at best’. Certainly she has never been known to utter a word of regret, remorse or apology for the women and children who have been killed by US drone attacks in various countries. Her heart seems quite intact as far as they are concerned.

Clinton’s purpose-driven morality blows around like a weathervane in a high wind but she is no more than the symptom of an ugly moment in history which has produced Guantanamo, extraordinary rendition and torture, the massacre of civilians on the ground and from the air in Baghdad, the urinating on the bodies of their victims by US soldiers in Afghanistan, and even the trophy mutilation of their bodies. One cannot be separated from the other. Reinforcing the systemic place of these crimes, very rarely has anyone even been rapped on the wrist for them.

Overshadowing them all, of course,  is the genocidal assault on Iraq, beginning in 1991, and continuing through more than a decade of sanctions and the second war of 2003, but not even for these most terrible crimes has anyone who committed them or was ultimately responsible for them been punished. Clinton and Obama arrived late but added Libya to the pile of corpses and in any case have adhered to the policies set by their neoconservative predecessors.
    
In this new overtly lawless world, Bashar al Assad is a prime target for assassination. Very possibly he was expected to be at the meeting targeted for bombing by the so-called Free Syrian Army in Damascus a few weeks ago. Usually governments feel obliged to abhor terrorism, especially when directed against the members of other governments, but this time the spokesman for the US State Department more or less said that the victims – the Defence Minister and two other senior figures in Assad’s inner circle – had it coming. Responsibility for this attack was claimed by Riad al Assad, the commander of the FSA who remarked: ‘God willing this will be the end of the regime. Hopefully Bashar will be next’. Mr Assad lives in southeastern Turkey under the protection of the Turkish state. The question is rhetorical but still has to be asked: has Turkey really reached the stage where its government gives sanctuary to a man who openly admits to organizing terrorist outrages in the capital city of another country and is looking forward to the murder of its head of state? The FSA leader’s fervent hope was later echoed in the assertion by French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius’ remark that Bashar does not deserve to be on this earth. In the world we used to have this would have been called incitement to murder. 

Prolonging Violence
   
Under the UN Charter it is incumbent on all members to seek the peaceful resolution of conflicts that threaten international order.  In Syria the US government and its allies have done the reverse. Through their intervention they have created a situation that threatens international order. In pursuit of their own agenda they have supported armed groups, imposed sanctions and agitated against the Syrian government through the UN Security Council and the Arab League.   

Far from trying to bring the violence to an end they have prolonged it in the hope that it will eventually bring down the government in Damascus. They have blocked every attempt at a settlement that does not involve the precondition of ‘regime change’. Kofi Annan’s ceasefire could not work because the ‘friends’ were not prepared to compel the armed groups to lay down their arms at the same time as the Syrian army did. Having learned its lesson in Homs, where the tanks were pulled off the streets, only for the ‘rebels’ to take advantage of their withdrawal to reclaim lost positions, the Syrian government is not going to play this game again.

Further back, Saudi Arabia and Qatar torpedoed the Arab League monitors’ mission the moment it became clear it would come up with findings not to their liking. Its report was suppressed as was, more recently, the report resulting from the on-the-ground inquiry into the Houla massacre by the UN Supervisory Mission in Syria (UNSMS). It reached the UN Secretary-General’s office but not the Security Council and the mission’s mandate was terminated soon afterwards.  The mission’s commander, Lieut-General Robert Mood, spoke at a press conference of conflicting evidence and it has to be assumed this was the reason for the report being buried. No solution has been allowed by the US that includes the participation of Iran. China and Russia have their own motives for supporting the government in Damascus but their position of opposition to outside intervention and support for negotiations without preconditions at least stands on firm moral and legal grounds. The main Syrian domestic opposition groups have now put forward an initiative for a negotiated settlement starting with the army and all armed factions laying down their weapons simultaneously. Having so far blocked every attempt at a settlement that does not meet their terms, will the ‘Friends of the Syrian People’ allow it to work?

Zero Problems?

In the campaign against Syria – or the Syrian ‘regime’ as the ‘friends’ would insist – Turkey’s role has been central.  Until the beginning of last year the Turkish government had pursued policies of ‘soft power’ and ‘zero problems’ around all of Turkey’s borders. It now suits supporters of the government’s position to argue that the ‘zero problems’ policy had failed, when all the evidence suggests that it had been a resounding success. Outstanding issues were resolved, new trade agreements signed and borders opened up. Relations with the two countries with which Turkey has had the most difficult relationship – Syria and Iran – had never been better. The ‘zero problems’ policy will stand as Foreign Minister Davutoglu’s greatest achievement:  its destruction will stand as his greatest failure. 

Libya marked the beginning of Turkey’s policy turnaround. Erdogan initially responded by saying that military intervention anywhere in the Middle East would be a disaster but with a western triumph inevitable Turkey climbed on board. The spectacle thus arose of a government selling itself on its Muslim credentials coming in behind yet another western attack on yet another Muslim country. With Libya finished – another functional state turned into a dysfunctional state – the western-gulf state alliance then turned its attention to Syria. Erdogan and Davutoglu abruptly dropped their attempts to persuade Bashar al Assad to accept their advice (apparently to negotiate with the Muslim Brotherhood and even to bring it into government) and turned on him. The ‘brother’ of a few months before was now the worst man in the world.

The crisis broke when the two men were already fashioning an enlarged regional and global role for Turkey drawing strength from the connections of the Ottoman past and building on Erdogan’s popular standing across the Arab world following his blistering criticism of Israel. In what critics described as ‘neo Ottomanism’, the two men saw Turkey as a regional leader, role model and servant, as Davutoglu put it a few months ago. A new Middle East was being formed and they positioned themselves on the crest of the wave of reform, albeit in a very selective way because they had little or nothing to say about the need for change in the Gulf states.

Out of Touch

Had Erdogan and Davutoglu been properly advised, had they been more alert, more tuned in to the realities of the Middle East, they would have known that Bashar would not soon be gone.    They would have known that he is popular with many Syrians and is seen by them as the best hope for reform. They would have known that confrontation with Syria would undermine relations with Iraq and Iran, as well as putting Turkey at odds with Russia and China. They would have known that these two powers would never allow a repeat of Libya and they might have guessed that the Kurds would take the opportunity of turmoil in Syria to strengthen their own position. They presumed to speak for the Syrian people when not even now is there any evidence that the ‘Syrian people’ in the mass support whom they support. The clearest evidence of what they want remains the referendum of February, when more than half the people on the electoral roll voted to remove the Baath party as the central pillar of society and state and bring in a multiparty system. Of course the changes did not go far enough:  after half a century of authoritarian rule, the mukhabarat state was never going to be transformed overnight but what was on offer was certainly better than the mayhem sweeping across Syria with the encouragement of governments that have  done nothing but harm to Arab interests over  the last two centuries.

Cost of Conflict

The costs of Turkey’s confrontation with Syria have been great. An effective regional policy has been wrecked in favor of policy incoherence. The Kurds have taken advantage of the turmoil, with the PKK escalating its attacks and the Syrian Kurds tightening their grip on the region just south of the border, raising alarm in Ankara at the possibility of a Syrian Kurdish enclave being added to the nucleus of a future ‘Greater Kurdistan’. Bashar is being blamed when it is clear that the Syrian army is stretched to the limit and no longer capable of policing the border as before.

The Iraqi Kurds have been sucked into the vortex of this conflict, with Massoud Barzani convening a meeting of the Syrian Kurds – including a faction closely linked to the PKK – and advising them to settle their differences in the common interest and take what they can. Because of the close political and trade links established with the northern Iraqi Kurdish governorate – at the expense of relations with the actual government of the country – Erdogan was infuriated at Barzani’s endorsement of actions seen as inimical to Turkey’s security interests. Rubbing salt into Iraq’s wounded pride, Davutoglu chose the middle of this crisis to visit the contested city of  Kirkuk.

In the southeast sanctions have killed off the cross-border trade with Syria that was the livelihood of merchants and traders in Hatay and Gaziantep provinces. The population of Hatay is more than 50 per cent Alevi and still connected to Alawis across the border by family ties. The Turkish Alevis are strongly opposed to their government’s policies and do not want the ‘refugees’ (formally the ‘guests’ of the Turkish government), the bearded jihadis or the agents of foreign governments in their midst. They see Bashar as the head of a secular regime which is the best guarantor of minority rights and they regard the prospect of a Muslim Brotherhood-type government of the kind apparently favored by Erdogan with absolute anathema. Their reaction to the situation has not been helped by Erdogan’s intermittent political point scoring at Alawi expense. The focus on Hatay revives the question of how the province came to be a Turkish possession in the first place: breaking the terms of its mandate over Syria, the French government handed the region to Turkey in 1938 as a placatory measure before the onset of the Second World War. As for the Turkish people in the mass, the most recent poll indicates that the majority do not support military intervention in Syria. Whether they are aware of how deeply their country already is involved is another matter.

Tens of thousands of Syrians are now pouring out of their country to seek refuge in Turkey, Iraq and Jordan. They are another consequence of the decision to prolong the fighting in Syria rather than help end it.Here it should be remembered that Syria took in half a million Palestinian refugees in 1948 and more than a million Iraqis after the US-led invasion of 2003 created the greatest refugee tragedy in the Middle East since 1948.Now it is Iraq that is taking in Syrian refugees. Refugees of a different category in Syria include the families of the 100,000 Syrians who were driven off the Golan Heights by Israeli forces in 1967.

Although everyone in the collective calling itself ‘The Friends of the Syrian People’ is playing their part, the role of Saudi Arabia and Qatar  – the paymasters –  is especially pernicious because it is based on a sectarian reordering of the Middle East, with Shi’ism dammed  behind a wall of Sunni  governments. Saudi Arabia is one of the most reactionary states in the world, not just the Middle East. Qatar is a liberal version of Saudi Arabia but still has no political parties, no parliament, no unions and a system of indentured foreign labor that has been likened to slavery and even bears the same name as that given to the columns of slaves trudging across Africa in the 19th century (the kafil, the name of the wooden collar yoking the slaves together.)

The unprecedented domestic success of Turkey’s Justice and Development Party government has now been followed by unprecedented folly in foreign affairs. It needs to get out of this mess without delay, a conclusion that has undoubtedly already been reached within the party. Turkey needs to get back to where it was and begin the process of repairing the damage done to relations with near neighbors, beginning with Iraq and Iran because it will be a long time before relations with Syria can be returned to an even keel. The whole Syrian venture will have to be wound down. The SNC will have to be abandoned (but it has been a waste of time and money from the beginning anyway) and the commander of the FSA asked to seek lodgings elsewhere. Whatever the support being given to the armed men it will have to be dried up.  This is going to create further complications but they will have to be faced. There will be loss of face but that is a problem for the individual politicians and advisers concerned: the interests of the country are the central issue and in any case, loss of face does not even begin to compare with the loss of more lives that will be the only result of persevering with a policy that has failed.   

– Jeremy Salt is an associate professor of Middle Eastern history and politics at Bilkent University in Ankara, Turkey. He contributed this article to PalestineChronicle.com

.http://www.palestinechronicle.com/view_article_details.php?id=19573

Zionist elements encouraging Islamophobia and antagonism towards Islam, to serve political interests.

Zionist elements encouraging Islamophobia and antagonism towards Islam, to serve political interests.

U.S. diplomatic missions all over the Muslim World have come under violent assault in recent days, all ostensibly on account of an online trailer for a film nobody has seen called “Innocence of Muslims.” The 14-minute clip, almost comically badly acted, depicts the Muslim Prophet Muhammad in a, well, unflattering light. The actors in the clip have insisted they were duped into thinking the film was set 2,000 years ago in (pre-Islamic) Egypt, and that the Muhammad character was named “George.”
Do we talk about calculations and premeditation ?But…were the reactions of Osama,of the Libyan jihadist or of the other terrorist fractions from Iraq or Middle East area miscalculated? Didn’t they expect that when a blasphemy movie ,produced by an elitist and sponsored by an Wahabi Qatari was released in the same hot period of politic ‘s change in the Arab World those reactions?Are the recent disagreements over invasion policy of Israhell and USA have anything to do with it?
The month of September has witnessed an accelerated trend of coordinated attempts in desecrating Islam and tarnishing the image of the Muslims across the globe.
Who is behind this ? No one really knows,but let search the media :they announced it since 2009:the IndiaGlitz magazine wrote:”A magnum opus is being filmed on Muhammad Ibn Abdullah, the founder of the religion of Islam and is regarded by Muslims as a messenger and prophet of God. The film is produced with a whooping budget of 150 millions by Hollywood producer Barrie M. Osborne, according to the announcement made in Qatar.

So, the Oscar-winning American producer is set to go on with his big-screen biopic of the Prophet Muhammad. According to sources, Osborne wants to show the real meaning of Islam and bridge the gap between cultures. We learn that the film will reportedly feature English-speaking Muslim actors.

Barrie M. Osborne (born February 7, 1944) is an American film producerexecutive producerproduction manager and director.

The son of Hertha Schwarz and William Osborne, Barrie was born in New York City[1] and grew up in New Rochelle, New York where he graduatedNew Rochelle High School.[2] He is an alumnus of Carleton College in Northfield, Minnesota and currently lives in WellingtonNew Zealand.

Osborne’s most notable work is The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King for which he was the recipient of the Academy Award for Best Picture, which he shares with Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh.

Osborne has recently got the backing of AlNoor Holdings, a Qatar media company for the production of a $200 million feature film about the Prophet Mohammed(WIKIPEDIA TELLS US ABOUT OSBORNE)

This untitled film is due to come before the camera by 2011. Osborne will be producing this film for a newly formed Qatar-based company Alnoor Holdings. “Qatar-based Sunni cleric Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi, head of the Association of Muslim Scholars, will lead the research and serve as technical consultant on the project,” said the sources.

“I am inspired by this opportunity to bring such epic entertainment to the world and excited by the chance to inspire and enlighten by bringing the story of one of history’s greatest figures to audiences around the world,” said the Hollywood producer.

A very tricky thing in producing a biopic on the prophet is that, many Muslims believe that the Islamic law forbids the visual depiction of ‘Muhammad’ or ‘God the Almighty’ in any medium. So, making a film without showing the prophet is a big challenge.

Let’s see what comes out now…” WERE THEY TRICKED? IS IT A FRAUD?THINK!
They only needed a reason to invade and attack!Do not let yourself fooled by the images of their media again:those extremist monkeys are not very smart ,just puppets in the hands of an evil puppeteer !USA could not let those “democratic ” apes to make the rules for the land filled with oil so they needed an excuse to send the marines ,as in Iraq! A movie which insults the Prophet Mohammad was not filmed over night but was released when it was necessary! These plans were long ago finished on paper or tape ! And those plans were designed by politicians and economists working for the elite,the military only apply it. After the apes were demonized by the press but they still have work to do,what was the priority?To make the Muslim World boil .So what better reason than an attack on the Prophet ,mocking the Holy Cora’n? Who cares now about the crime of the terrorists?Isn’t is a suicide crime?The master gave up a piece ,using a personal tool!The result :a double gain:victimized itself,spotlighted it and made the ape look like a hero in the eyes who had doubts,which is not!Remember Bulgaria a while ago? They need the crime to accomplish the plan! And who funds and help them ?Aljazeera just a while ago were saying that we won’t show this picture because it is disturbing but some other us media might show it to flare up anger against USA. Back in 2009 the Zionist media was writing:”
Alnoor execs plan to announce the first greenlit project in the coming days.

The announcement coincided with Thursday’s launch of the inaugural Doha Tribeca Film Festival. The four-day event is a partnership between the Qatar Museums Authority, dedicated to developing cultural initiatives in the country, and Tribeca co-founders Robert De Niro, Jane Rosenthal and Craig Hatkoff.

The fest is the brainchild of Sheikha Mayassa Bint Hamad Bin Khalifa Al-Thani, chair of the Qatar Museums Authority Board of Trustees and daughter of the emir of Qatar.
“If you want to invest in the film industry, the best place to invest is Hollywood,” Alnoor Holdings chairman Ahmed Al-Mustafawi Al-Hashem said!Alnoor Holdings, which has been building up its investment in the Arab media biz in recent years, will invest $40 million into the fund directly, with the remaining coin coming from private investors across the Gulf region. The fund will be aimed squarely at Hollywood and international projects.
blasphemous movie desecrating the person of the holy Prophet of Islam has been released in the United States simultaneously with the 9/11 tragic incident cannot be looked upon as sheer coincidence.

In a coordinated effort, UK channel 4 broadcast a documentary called ‘Islam: The Untold Story’ last week in stark distortion of Islam. Director Tom Holland who is so dismally bereft of any knowledge on Islam claims there is little written contemporary evidence about the origin of Islam and the life of Prophet Mohammad (PBUH). Even barely noted for his vampire and supernatural stories, Holland’s non-fiction books have nothing to do with religious matters or Islam.

In the documentary, he has included Patricia Crone, an infamous pseudo-scholar affiliated to the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton who has intensely voiced her seasoned antagonism against Islam in the past. In ‘Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World’ which she coauthored with her associate Michael Cook, Crone fallaciously argues that the Holy Quran was composed, possibly in Syria or Iraq, more than fifty years after the Prophet’s death and ascribed to the Prophet. Crone also says that the Holy Book was fabricated during the reign of Caliph Abdul Malik (685-705) in an attempt to legitimize an expanding empire. The authors refer to early Muslims as Hagarenes, the descendants of Prophet Abraham by Hagar in order to differentiate them from the Jews, who are the descendants of Abraham by Sarah.

These words which are basically tinged with blind bias and reek of insufficient and destructive knowledge about the glorious faith issue from the mouth of those who are fully aware of the vanity of their claim and who follow a financially rewarding agenda.

The documentary was faced with a deluge of criticism from the Muslim community and received over 1000 complaints with the channel and another 200 with the UK media regulator Ofcom.

By way of avoiding an investigation into the matter, an Ofcom spokesman has said, “We will assess them and if we believe there has been a possible breach of the broadcasting code, we would hold an investigation, but no decision to that effect has been taken.”

As a matter of fact, there are influential parties in the UK which are actively engaged in disseminating the seeds of antagonism against Islam. A representative group which is funded by the Zionist Jews and Christians in the UK is the English Defense League (EDL). The group has over the recent years developed multiple sister branches in Europe and America. With their main agenda to foster enmity against the Muslim community in any part of the world, the EDL naturally spares no efforts in their hate-mongering campaign, defiling the name of Islam and inviting their members to crusade against the Muslims.

One of the wicked spawns of this pervert group is Norwegian Anders Behring Breivik who went on a shooting spree and killed 77 innocent people in 2011 in Norway. He reportedly had hundreds of EDL members as Facebook friends. The NDL or Norwegian Defense League is a sister organization of the EDL. The two organizations are practically run and managed by one single person and the two follow the same policy. On a number of occasions, members of the NDL have travelled to the UK to receive training or instructions from the EDL.

In October 2010, American Rabbi Nachum Shifren, went to the UK where he was warmly received by the EDL members whom he described as “one group in England with moral courage.” In his hate speech, he spewed out the most loathsome words, and referred to the Muslims as dogs that “eat each other alive.”

He told EDL, “History will be recorded that on this day, read by our children for eternity, one group lit the spark to liberate us from the oppressors of our two governments and the leftist, fifth column, quisling press, and that it was the EDL which started the liberation of England from evil.”

It is manifest that these evil forces work hand in hand to spread hatred and stoke violence.

Also, firebrand American pastor Terry Jones who has long been making strenuous efforts to legitimize the burning of the Holy Quran and whose call to fight Islam has resulted in a number of deaths is closely
On Tuesday, the Journal spoke to a man who claimed to be the director and called himself Sam Bacile. He described himself as a 52-year-old Israeli-American real-estate developer, called Islam a “cancer,” and said the film had been funded by Jewish donors to the tune of $5 million.
But as the Journal reports, there are no records of a “Sam Bacile” either in the U.S. or Israel. The Journal also reports that “Sam Bacile’s” phone number was traced to an address in Cerritos, Calif., which appears to be the home of somebody named Nakoula Bassely Nakoula. Along with a “Sam Basselley,” Mr. Nakoula is listed as one of the film’s producers. In a conversation with the Associated Press, he denied being Sam Bacile but claimed to be a Coptic Christian and the manager of the company that had produced the film.
HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO UNDERLINE THE SECTARIAN FIGHT SEEDED BY THESE GULF MONARCHS,THE SAME WHO ARE GUILTY OF THE MIDDLE EAST SITUATION IN PRESENT ,LOYAL SERVANTS OF THE ZIONIST IDENTITY AND CORPORATE IN THE WORLD?

On the holy holiday of the Holy Cross the officially USA/Saudi-backed, funded and armed Al Farouq Battalion terrorist group announces it has burned the Assyrian Catholic Patriarchal Church. Firefighters were not able to reach the sight after all their cars and equipment have been destroyed by “rebels” or what is known in the Western media and identified by Western leaders as “freedom fighters”.The gangs of the “battalion Farouk” FSA (free slaves of America &Wahhabism) ,  led by the bully Abdul Razak Talas and obeys of the bastard Adnan Aeraour, proceeded to burn it before midnight, yesterday ,local time for Syria.May Allah burn their hands and souls,ya rab!


.

the real Syrian Free Press

*

*

  • 50 facts that show the truth about the freedom of expression in Syria and Libya – Here all the sources of the video
  • 50 fatti che dimostrano la verità cirxca la libertà d’espressione in Siria e Libia – A seguire tutte le fonti del video

*

(1) CNN – CIA’s News Network

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57xIW9H6cCc

(2)Robert Fish interviews Syrian Army Generals

Robert Fisk: ‘They snipe at us then run and hide in sewers’

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/robert-fisk-they-snipe-at-us-then-run-and-hide-in-sewers-8063515.html

Robert Fisk: ‘No power can bring down the Syrian regime’

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/fisk/robert-fisk-no-power-can-bring-down-the-syrian-regime-8070029.html

(3) Delegazione Siro-Italiana incontra Presidente Parlamento Siriano, dr. Mahmoud

http://syrianfreepress.wordpress.com/2012/05/08/video-integrale-delegazione-siro-italiana-incontra-presidente-parlamento-siriano-dr-mahmoud-al-abrash-10425/ (ITALIANO)

(4) Assad interviewed by Barbara Walters

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWtBct3dt9w

(5) Bashar Assad interviewed by Todenhöfer, July 5th 2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBJlpY1qX28

(6) Syria – Gilles Jacquier was killed by Terrorists 18-07-2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGr_Ao_U1eI

(7) Syria: Bombs hit cars escorting ANSA correspondent, one dies

http://www.ansamed.info/ansamed/en/news/sections/generalnews/2012/06/20/Syria-Bombs-hit-cars-escorting-ANSA-correspondent-one-dies_7067164.html

http://www.grr.rai.it/dl/grr/notizie/ContentItem-0bfe284d-d663-4cce-b45f-c1f3abff50ec.html (ITALIANO)

(8) Porta a Porta, “Attacco alleato alla Libia”, 21 Marzo 2011

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1ZH6UDRleU (ITALIANO)

View original post 656 more words

North Resistance

(WARNING: INCLUDES GRAPHIC FOOTAGE.)

FSA terrorists throw post-office workers from the building:

FSA terrorists behead an unarmed civilian:

FSA terrorists murder unarmed civilian:

Leaked video , fabrication of a video by the FSA terrorists to accuse Syrian Soldiers:

FSA terrorists torturing an old man of beit Berri before executing him:

FSA terrorists throw a civilian from the top of a building:

Execution of a family, Beit berri, by FSA terrorists:

FSA terrorists bury a Syrian alive:

Al Qaeda FSA terrorists execute a civilian for merely supporting the government.

FSA terrorists kill christians in Deir ezzor

FSA terrorists bomb an area mainly Druze and Christians: Aftermath

FSA terrorist murder a civilian who criticized the FSA terrorists

FSA terrorists genocide against Minorities in Syria

FSA terrorists behind Hama killings of families  june 6/2012

FSA terrorist try to use a prisoner as a suicide bomber, and fail:

FSA terrorist shoot a man from…

View original post 12 more words


When economies are taken down,when the elite makes the rules,then  you should open your eyes and and act and do it fast!Is there a backfire in the past events in Libya?Or do we talk about calculations and premeditation ?***************************************************************************************************When the USA decides that “democracy” is needed in a certain area it is the point in time when “the jihadist” enter the scene.They used them in Afganistan and Iraq ,in Libya and now in Syria,it is a proved fact so I will not insist on it.But…were the reactions of Osama,of the Libyan jihadist or of the other terrorist fractions from Iraq or Middle East area miscalculated? Didn’t they expect that when a  blasphemy movie  ,produced by an elitist and sponsored  by an Wahabi  Qatari was released in the same hot period of  politic ‘s change in the Arab World  those reactions?I think they did! They only needed a reason to invade and attack!Do not let yourself fooled by the images of their media again:those extremist monkeys are not very smart ,just puppets in the hands of an evil puppeteer !USA could not let those “democratic ” apes to make the rules for the land filled with oil so they needed an excuse to send the marines ,as in Iraq! A movie which insults the Prophet Mohammad was not filmed over night but was released when it was necessary! These plans were long ago finished on paper or tape ! And those plans were designed by politicians and economists  working for the elite,the military only apply it. After the apes were demonized by the press  but they still have work to do,what was the priority?To make the Muslim World boil .So what better reason than an attack on the Prophet ,mocking the Holy Cora’n?  Who cares now about the  crime of the terrorists?Isn’t is a suicide  crime?The master gave up a piece ,using a personal tool!The result :a double gain:victimized itself,spotlighted  it and made the ape look like a hero in the eyes who had doubts,which is not!Remember Bulgaria a while ago?  And why?Look around:on what economic field there seems to be no problems in the actual crisis? How long is the distance between a pharmacy owned by a big corporate and another?  They need us sick! They need the crime to accomplish the plan!

REMEMBER!?

 

Friends of Syria

In an effort to move forward in conflict-wracked Syria, Russia is currently advocating for the creation of a transitional government that would oversee the task of organizing and carrying out a transparent presidential election.

Bogdanov, who held meetings in Paris on Monday with high-ranking French diplomats and representatives of the Syrian opposition, said the diplomats are attempting to convince both the Syrian opposition and the Assad government to implement the conditions set down in the Geneva agreements.

“We’re putting significant effort into convincing both the Syrian opposition and the government to implement Geneva agreements,” Bogdanov told RT. “The Syrian government has already agreed to this in principle, while some members of the opposition forces are also in agreement with us.”

Bogdanov believes that the warring parties must immediately adhere to a ceasefire and begin implementing Kofi Annan’s peace plan.

“The solution (to resolving the crisis) lies in promoting talks not…

View original post 693 more words

Friends of Syria

SYRIAN TERRORIST WAR CRIMES IN LIGHT OF DAY; FRENCH COMMANDER TELLS TERRORISTS “YOU CANNOT LOSE ALEPPO OR ITS THE END”. 

If you haven’t heard, the listen to this:  Fake Syrian Army murderers executed over 20 Syrian soldiers near Hanano after a suicide attack on their position.  The commanding officer, a sergeant, ordered the men to drop their arms and surrender.  It appears he reckoned that the terrorists would want to trade his men for their own prisoners.  He was wrong.  After reciting the usual meaningless “Allahu Akbar”, the terrorists murdered our soldiers in cold blood.

All shot in the head at close range, a line of our Syrian soldiers grace the lens of some vicious, accursed murderer.  They should never have surrendered to killers.  All were Sunni soldiers. 

Every Saudi and Qatari should now be on the watch.  We will avenge our soldiers with the blood of these Arabian deviants and their horde of wretched, ape-like children.  If…

View original post 219 more words

PICHON

PICHON

The French Syria specialist Frédéric Pichon:
” I have witnessed the results myself. I have seen in Syria how on Easter the imam from the neighboring mosque will come to visit the church in order to present his best wishes to the priest. And vice-versa: the priest will visit the imam”

The French Syria specialist Frédéric Pichon accuses the Western media of irresponsibility in its treatment of the Syria crisis: of being ignorant about the region and its history, neglecting to verify sources, blithely parroting activist talking points–in short, of “refusing to deal with the reality.” After completing a first degree in Arabic, Pichon lived for many years as a teacher in Beirut, before returning to France, where he completed a doctoral thesis on the Christian minority in Syria. His most recent book is a co-authored volume on “The Geopolitics of the Middle East and North Africa” (Presses Universitaires de France, 2012) In a recent interview he said that “SOHR has a name that is very reassuring. It is reassuring, notably, for the media. I have experienced this personally in speaking with a journalist from one of France’s leading news channels. When I raised some questions about the organization, the journalist replied, “Really? But it’s got ‘human rights’ in the name!” So, from the point of view of marketing, the name is obviously well-chosen.But the problem is precisely that so little is known about the SOHR and yet the media continue to use it as source without asking any questions about the accuracy of the casualty numbers it reports or whether all the civilians reported killed were in fact civilians. What we know for sure about the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights is that it is not based in Syria. It is based in London. The president of the organization is named Rami Abdel Rahman. But it would appear that no such person even exists. In mid-2011, a few journalists worthy of the name first raised doubts about the matter. The confirmation did not come from pro-regime sources, but rather from the SOHR itself. In January of this year, the SOHR published a notice on its website acknowledging that Rami Abdel Rahman does not exist and explaining that the name is a pseudonym used by various collaborators of the organization. But this has not stopped the AFP, Reuters and other news agencies from continuing to cite “Rami Abdel Rahman, president of the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights” to this very day!
By the way, the choice of the pseudonym could provide a clue about the group’s orientation. “Abdel Rahman” is a name that has a very definite resonance in Arabic. It means “servant of the Merciful”–“the Merciful” being one of the names given to Allah in the Quran. So, in other words, the name means “servant of Allah .” All the chapters of the Quran begin with the invocation of “Allah, the Merciful.” Muslims will have this invocation engraved in their memory”. Asked about the observers’missions he said:”Why has the report of the Arab League mission received so little attention? It was, after all, readily available–not only in Arabic, but also in English and in French–by the end of January. It is true that the report reveals certain picaresque aspects of the mission itself. It would appear that some of the observers preferred to stay in their hotel in Damascus, rather than to venture out onto the terrain, as they were supposed to do. But the report also revealed the presence in Syria of what are described as “armed groups” possessing not only light weaponry, but also heavy weaponry, including “armour-piercing projectiles.” All of this is difficult to reconcile with the romantic vision that was prevalent in the Western media at the time and that depicted the opposition as being essentially unarmed. The report likewise found that the French journalist Gilles Jacquier, who was killed in Homs on January 11, was killed by opposition mortar fire, not by Syrian government forces. Perhaps it is because Saudi Arabia unilaterally declared the mission to have been a “failure” that we have heard so little about it.”About Daraa at the beginning of events,Pichon said:”Deraa is a city that is known for its ties to Islamic radicalism, just across the border from Jordan, where, it should be recalled, the Muslim Brotherhood is a major political force. Numerous jihadists who fought in Iraq are known to have came from Deraa. It is also notable that Deraa is a kind of Sunni enclave in a region where the majority is Druze. There were no protests in the other towns in the area.
As concerns the involvement of armed Islamist groups, recent terror attacks in Damascus and Aleppo obviously bear the hallmark of al-Qaeda.Last summer,around late August, early September, some of Syria’s regional neighbors–above all, Saudi Arabia and Qatar–got involved. Libya appears also to have been involved. Several sources have spoken of jihadists and weaponry reaching Syria via Turkey from the Libyan port of Misrata.
Behind all of this, one has to see the role being played by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, which have been attempting to exercise a kind of leadership over the Sunni Arab world in an effort to counter the rising power of Iran.

.I have spent a lot of time visiting Christian communities in Syria. There have been reports of violence against religious minorities in areas controlled by the Syrian opposition: against Alawis, but also against Christians.
It was perhaps in order to defuse such reports that in January of this year, the Free Syrian Army published an official text providing assurances that the rights of minorities would be respected. The text cited the famous Pact of Umar, a decree that was supposedly issued by the Caliph Umar in the 8th century and that is traditionally cited to demonstrate the protected status that religious minorities or dhimmi enjoy in Islam. The pact, by the way, is a forgery that was written later. All historians agree on this.There is in fact nothing in the pact that should be reassuring for minorities or, in particular, for Christians. The spirit of the document is entirely medieval!Under Assad father and now the son’ rule there has really been a sort of “Syrian exception” in the Middle East in this respect: not only with regard to Christians, but also with regards to other religious minorities–the Alawis, of course, but also the Druze. Since the 1970s, the regime succeeded in developing a Syrian national consciousness that makes no confessional distinctions. It is true that this civic consciousness was, in a sense, imposed from above. Every form of confessional politics was associated with “fitna”–“disunion” or “discord”–and was repressed. “Fitna” is originally an Islamic concept, but here it was given a secular usage. I have witnessed the results myself. I have seen in Syria how on Easter the imam from the neighboring mosque will come to visit the church in order to present his best wishes to the priest. And vice-versa: the priest will visit the imam.”translated from French by Syrian Democratic Future
https://www.facebook.com/SyDFuture

ITALIAN BY

:Il ricercatore francese Frédéric Pichon ha fatto presente che Arabia Saudita e Qatar stanno istigando contro la stabilità della Siria, invitando ad inviare armi e ribelli.

Pichon, docente di storia contemporanea ed esperto di Siria, in un articolo ha scritto che il suo paese ha abusato per molto tempo delle intenzioni dell’opposizione siriana armata e sostenuta dai regimi arabi, guidati dal Qatar, consentendo un afflusso costante di elementi di al Qaeda in Siria ed esponendo il Paese al rischio di diventare un luogo di attrazione per il terrorismo similmente a quanto accaduto per l’Afghanistan.

Pichon ha sottolineato che la Francia deve essere consapevole che il flusso di attrezzature e armi finanziati generosamente da sauditi e Qatar ai gruppi armati in Siria viene a confermare ciò che si è parlato in precedenza: il rischio di una presa di potere di al-Qaeda nel territorio siriano.

the real Syrian Free Press

*

Just to accuse the army of committing criminal acts, terrorists mercenaries storming the main piping of water from the city of Aleppo, and now the mass media are marketing the news that the army did to the thirsty city.

*

VIDEO DEI TERRORISTI PIÙ STUPIDI AL MONDO

VIDEO OF THE MOST STUPID TERRORISTS IN THE WORLD

*

Pur di accusare l’esercito di commettere azioni criminali, i terroristi mercenari prendono d’assalto la tubazione principale d’acqua della città di Aleppo, ed ora sui massa media stanno commercializzando la notizia che l’esercito lo abbia fatto per assetare la cittadina..

*

TG24Siria  &  SyrianFreePress.net Network

https://syrianfreepress.wordpress.com/

http://syrianfreepress.wordpress.com/2012/09/10/fake-media-and-true-facts-falsi-mediatici-e-fatti-reali-eng-ita-video-of-the-most-stupid-terrorists-in-the-world/

*

*

*

View original post

Syria is the key

Syria is the key

How Syria is threatening America’s interest in the Middle East can only be understood in the context of U.S. plans to reconfigure the Middle East. Knowing now that the motive for invading Iraq was strategic :to use Iraq as a permanent military operation base and as we witnessed later,after US redrawal asked by Iraqi authorities, as a gate for the different groups of mercenaries or secret services’agents.
U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East only safeguards the continuous flow of oil and other national interests, including a policy of oil-denial, carried out since the mid-1940s.Rapid Deployment Forces during the Carter administration; Dual Containment and the “Quiet War” under the Clinton administration; and the Preemptive Doctrine under the Bush administration. These policies have been instrumental in maintaining U.S. hegemony in the region and preempting any threats that could damage U.S. interests or those of its allies including Israel, Turkey, and the Arab states of the Gulf region.

Without a UN-backed resolution to attack on Iraq, the United States and Great Britain took unilateral actions to lead a four-day bombing strike on Baghdad in late December 1998. According to former Undersecretary of State Martyn Indyk, the United States received the blessing of the Gulf leaders to do things in secret, engaging in destroying Iraq’s military and economic infrastructure and bombing Iraqi facilities under the pretext that they represented potential future threats.This was the first step taken in order to force the Syrian and Iranian rulers to make their systems compatible the White House’s views as taking over Syria would give the United States strategic depth in the region, allowing for the creation of sectarian struggle and extremists dominating the state in favor of the United States’ regional allies Israel and Turkey.
Simultaneously,it has been started the proliferation of ” democratic marionette leaders” in the Arab world who would ultimately resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict in line with what Israel has hoped to achieve.
Former President Bush explained that invading Iraq was the necessary first step to start the wave.

Some Middle East leaders , at the June 2004 G-8 summit meeting, lobbied for the use of the term “partnership”in the ” selective democratization process” and highlighted their desire to work with the United States on the issue,against the interests of the Arab masses doomed to foreign occupation under a veiled name:
“democracy”,an imported concept with paper- made of -base,with no respect,for specific historical circumstances for the society and for the people they would apply it on!
How would these changes in Syria would have served the United States?
1) A destabilisation of the Resistance axis …the United States will have completed its final stage of encircling Iran.In 2006, Iran and Syria signed a mutual defense treaty in response to the growing possibility of conflict with the West and it was tested in the past months and proved to be fulfilled by both sides
2) A pro-U.S. regime in Syria would tip the region’s balance of power toward Israel . Accordingly the United States and Israel would be in position to dictate a peace settlement to the Syrians over the Golan Heights.
3) the balance going down for Russia,which would loose its influence in Mediterranean “Unilateral US sanctions against Syria and Iran are increasingly becoming extra-territorial in nature and are touching upon the interests of Russian business,” Lavrov said on Saturday after meeting with US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the Russian port city of Vladivostok. He added that Russian banks were particularly being affected by the bans on Syria and Iran when the Russian government has clearly stated on numerous occasions that they will not step back during a strike against Syria,
4)by developing its economic capabilities and knowing its military ones ,Syria could have become a threatening force in the region so in this war scenario, Syria ‘s economy had to be the main target,according to the concept of deliberately engineered wars by elitists to distract the masses away from particular global developments that work to the benefit of the establishment power structure ,for example the oil prices skyrocketing due to increased Middle Eastern distress,prices established in dollars.
5)The reason of the huge crisis “the war is guilty not the elite”.Anything can be blamed on it while the real culprits ,the international and central banks which have been corrupting and dismantling the economies benefit most from the distraction.

the real Syrian Free Press

*

*

Syria, 9/9/2012 – Bomb Attack in Aleppo

Terrorist Bombing in Aleppo Claims 27 Lives, Injures More Than 64

A car bomb exploded in at al-Malab neighborhood in Aleppo, with reports indicating casualties among civilians. 27 citizens were martyred and 64 were injured in this attack.

Governor of Aleppo said that the terrorist bombing took place near al-Hayat Hospital and the Central Hospital.

The bombing caused significant material damage to the two hospitals, al-Nusour al-Zahabiya elementary school, and nearby buildings.

20120909-222026.jpg

Attentato Terroristico ad Aleppo

L’attentato terroristico più atroce a cui abbia forse mai assistito la Siria fin ad oggi è avvenuto alle 8:15 di stasera ad Aleppo, il corrispondente della Tv Siriana ha appena concluso il suo intervento informando che l’attentato è stato causato dall’esplosione di un’auto bomba imbottita di 1200 kg di esplosivo, parcheggiata nella zona di “AL KURA AL ARDIYA”, l’incrocio più popolare della città, dove si…

View original post 116 more words

Answering to a journalist that believed the recent report of the so-called “Independent” INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION OF INQUIRY (COI) formed by UN about some massacres in Syria, believed it is a definite proof that Syrian “regime” is a war criminal…

from a dear friend::::::::::::::::
Dear friends,
I’d like to share you my answer to a journalist that believed the recent report of the so-called “Independent” INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION OF INQUIRY (COI) formed by UN about some massacres in Syria, believed it is a definite proof that Syrian “regime” is a war criminal…

Dear XXX,

I had an overview on the report. I feel really a lot of pain of the big amount of disinformation… it is very well done to a degree that it is really convincing for any one who doesn’t know the country in depth or didn’t spent more than a couple of weeks there…

You said:
“Also, they interviewed hundreds of witnesses (1.062 to be exact): they are all terrorist,salafis, revolutionaries?”
Well, they are not necessarily terrorists or Salafi, but they are all liars!!!
They based on interviews either from the “Refugee camps” or via skype, obviously with selected people:
Refugee camps:
Who goes to those camps?
Given that Syria hosted 2 millions of Iraqi people in the few years after 2003, the third of Lebanese population during the Israeli war on Lebanon 2006, and has hosted 1.5 million of Palestinians since 1948… other than the other ethnic groups (Armenians, Sharkas, Turkman…) who escaped from the Ottomans… and that Syria didn’t even set one tent for those refugees, but hosted them in popular houses and/or among Syrians… Syria treats Palestinians exactly as Syrians in civil rights, many of them are officials in government while in Lebanon a Palestinian doctor or engineer can only work under supervision of a Lebanese one…

So is it likely that such government kills its people like that? And furthermore, according to the media and the report that Syrian government (or what it calls Shabbiha who are pushed by it) kills people only because they are opposition!!! This is absurd! Yes it is for 2 reasons:

1) Because Syrian government (President, government, army) are MORAL AND NOT CRIMINAL

2) Simply Because there is NO BENEFIT for the “regime” in killing civilians! This will only increase the pressure of the international community against it and isolates it (obviously this is exactly the benefit of the military opposition)

Then what about the “indication” that EVERY meeting at Security Council is preceded by a massacre the night before?!!!

You should have heard the several reports about importing Islamist fighters to Syria.
I ask you the question:

Which part is likely to commit massacres?

Is it the Syrian state that is interested in bringing security back and that is based on regular army that consists of Syrian youth doing their military service, many of them are university graduated , belonging to ALL components of Syria, all cities, all sects? and that consists of engineers, doctors and academics?

Or the part that consists of FREE army, actually FREE gangs. BTW, there’s NOTHING organized called FSA. FSA in fact is the name of non centralized groups of fighters consisting of extremist Jihadist Salafi people and ex-criminals and drug addicted people?!!!

Let me tell you something:
I am one of those who did the military service at Syrian army, and Syrian soldiers that are defending Syria against those gangs are people like me. So if you think they are committing massacres, slaughter people, bulldoze houses of civilians… this means that people like me are doing that, while those foreign extremist mercenaries are the innocent victims.

I don’t know if you are aware of the Slovakian scenario (Serbia and Kosovo)? It is very similar to what’s going on in Syria in lies and NATO role, but I believe what’s going on in Syria is more tense because it is based on Islamist hatred against Shiia and Alawi people and because it is not in Europe… and because the Israeli benefit in destroying Syria.

Why? Either against money or (The most of the cases) because they are fanatic sectarian. I know several people who are very far away from being religious but they are very sectarian, they hate minorities, especially Allawi people, and this is the main motivation for them to be opposition. They would accept a Sunni president and shout for his life even if he collect the demonstrators against him by bildozer and burn them with benzin. They beg Nato and even Israel to make a military intervention in their country to topple the regime and give them the power even if they destroy the country. Dany, the reporter of CNN is one example, he said in an interview on CNN that they don’t mind if Israel intervene militarily in Syria to topple the regime. They know very well how much Israel cares about Syrian people. Dani is just a very “nice” example relatively to others. So it is not about people, not about civilians, not about human right… nor about democracy.

BLAMED AND CONDEMNED FOR HAVING A PERSONAL VIEW!

BLAMED AND CONDEMNED FOR HAVING A PERSONAL VIEW!

This article was not written as a statistic historical one,but only as a personal view of an ordinary citizen who is not a political analyst nor has anything to do with a specific political party or organization.
What I am trying to picture are the reasons of my actual position and the tone of the previous written articles :Why does an #European born and raised ,supports Mr.President Assad and his stance against the Imperialist powers!
When I was a primary school pupil I had a #Jewish neighbor friend and her parents are the ones who first spoke about macropolitics,as long as I remember.They used to say :”yes,we are Jewish but we do not and will never recognize Israel.We do not consider a normal fact forming a state based on citizens’ religion.Maybe along history we had too many wars for personal beliefs and it is about time that humans think about a future for all,as individuals and societies !It is history who has demonstrated that big organizations or Monster states and their marionettes or satelites used do not have a long life”.
When the other neighbors asked them why not fleeing #Romania which was ruled by Ceausescu,they used to answer:fleeing to Israel,as the trend is now,would be the same to change a small chain for a bigger one:here we can not publicly practice our religion but we have it in our souls and do it in our homes.There,we could do that but the price is us obeying to a uglier mean master who makes the rules”.
The time has passed,the #revolution came in 1989 and lots of facts happened since then in my country,facts which did not get the proper attention:the vultures are hunting but the victims can not feel it!
The first thing on their agenda was to seed sectarian sedition among Christians in Romania:Catholics and Orthodox-we witnessed the fights from Targu Mures,Transilvania.Than the second important step the destruction of the national economy which was broken into pices or brought to bankcruptcy so it could be bought cheap by the big #Zionist corporate firms!The national debts have started growing ,the taxes level even faster,so the International financial forums could get the control of every internal decision.
Where are we now?IMF decideswho keeps his/her job,what salaries’ level is and how the budget is organized!But most of the Romanians were not bothered because they remember only the long rows of staying in line so they could buy the basic food,the interdiction to practice the religion,whatever this is or to own a personal property,the long nights spent in cold because rationalization,the interdictions to travel outside borders…
Now they do have all these!But can they afford ?Most of the Romanians can not!Agriculture is in ruin if the land was not bought by foreigners!A big segment was forced to flee the country searching for a better payed job in Europe,#Australia or other places on this Earth,of course for a salary level much lower than the level payed for the nationals of those countries but which looks huge for them.Who wins? The big corporatist! See the boulevards filled with farmacies or banks that says it all!The health of our society!See the shops filled with foreign synthetic products.The dirt #media filled our screens,which used to work only a few hours per day for propaganda but don’t we see now propaganda too? Our children are being indoctrinated with a sick idea of freedom,with no respect for the #Holy Books ,with sexual hidden flash even in the cartoons they watch or the idea of making money by selling their souls or bodies money which should be used to buy the products of those companies which have to be sold,with no respect for history or elders or even persoal esteem !
Fifteen years ago ,I have married a #Syrian,a real patriot with large knowledge of history.This is when I have started being connected with Syria,one of the most beautiful countries I have seen(other than Romania) and which I love so much!
Since then,we spent every summer,and some winters there!Every year I,ve tried to accumulate as much knowledge about it and visit as many places as I could! I’ve met its people,I listened their stories and Syrians helped me understand their views.At the same table ,in my parents-in-law ‘ house Shia_Sunni-Christians enjoy the quality family time!In Aleppo we’ve met people with small manufacturies,we liked their products and we started colaborating with them for selling it here…In Damascus I was showed the most of those magic historical places but also the modern built areas and how Syria was developing a good future for next generations.In Hama we used to go to buy “halawe b’jbne” and watching for hours the water mills rolling.In Homs,before taking the road back to Romania,I used to do my shopping and because we were doing this anual trip by car,I used to fill it with “mshalale,jbne beda,maqdus sweets and nuts,mloukhie yabse” and all kind of tasty grains.And the sellers were smilling and inviting us to taste those natural products!In Palmira we made fun of my mother in law who was scared of bedouins stealing her beautiful grand daughters…Our kids were so happy playing on the golden sands of the beaches in Latakia or Tartous and I was thrilled seeing their rubin coloured faces caused by the fresh ,cold air from Casiun,Qadmus or Mashta Halw.
The souvenirs for my family and friends here used to be bought from the Holy Christian placesfrom Damascus,Sydnaya or from those wonderful Homs’monasteries or just from the old markets of the cities we were traveling through .
Magic moments,as you can see…and tears in my eyes as I am writing about it now…
THE MONSTERS DID NOT LIKE THIS VIEW
The monsters had plans for the resources and geographic area…
The monsters had to destroy all these and they have applied their decades preparations,openlly ,since 2011…That summer :we entered Syria from Kasap,Latakia ‘s mountains-on the road,two trucks loaded with women and children refugees from Turkey ,not guarded:when they saw the plates with foreign numbers they started singing:”Allah ,Suria ,Bashar w bas” ;next week we were in Latakia Orange mall,Al Jazeera said the national army was bombing the city from the sea side,it almost gave a heart attack to my mother in law,but we were having fun=just lies of biased…the first shock…in Bab Sbaa,Homs I witnessed the cruel,monstrous game rolling…I saw how the bodies of two teenagers were thrown in front of the building …killed because one of them did not want to close his shop on Friday-he was Christian and he was closing it on Sundays,next days a RPG hit the same building,on 10th of September the monsters were screaming the names of soldiers and civilians considered to be “shabiha” -judging only by the names they were condemned…on 11th ,4 of them were dead…we went for their funerals…
How could I adopt a different stance?How could I stay inert seeing my adoptive country destroyed by those monsters and by a a few stupid,brainwashed locals who sold themselves?I couldn’t! And I chose to write about it and try to prove my point having as the only weapon my keyboard or the pen!Guess what:me and my husband are listed as “shabiha” and found guilty of being with “the system” thou we live in Europe and we are not financial connected to it or with any official person or organization,just because our point of view!
VIVA THE DEMOCRACY,BUT THE REAL ONE!

CounterPsyOps

 

Satellite companies Nilesat and Arabsat have stopped broadcasting Syrian television stations in a clear act of hostility against the Damascus government.

The operators took Syria’s state television channel as well as pro-government channels al-Ekhbaryah and al-Dunya off air on Wednesday shortly after a meeting of Arab League ministers in Cairo.

In June, the Arab League asked satellite operators Nilesat and Arabsat to shut down Syrian TV signals.

The operators, however, continue broadcasting Syria’s anti-Damascus television channels.

The Syrian government has slammed the move as an attempt to silence the Syrians, stressing that it is in violation of media ethics.

View original post 125 more words

the real Syrian Free Press

*

(EXCLUSIVE)
Putin: Using Al-Qaeda in Syria like sending Gitmo inmates to fight 

*

*

In an RT global exclusive premiere, President Putin gives his first post-inauguration interview, speaking in depth with RT’s Kevin Owen ahead of the APEC summit in Vladivostok.

­Touching upon a range of issues, he discusses topics from the Pussy Riot trial to the Julian Assange case, from the upcoming US elections to the situation in Syria.

RT: What I want to talk about first of all is the ongoing at the moment APEC summit. You’ll be going there very shortly – in Vladivostok because it’s the first time that Russia has held it, a prestigious event. But it always begs the question – what’s actually achieved at these events, events like that, like the G8, G20?

Now, though APEC is primarily an economic vessel, there’s a lot of politics involved as well. And of course a…

View original post 7,666 more words

NWO Observer

by Anders
Published: Feb. 07, 2010 – Euro-med.dk

Summary: There is a man who is more dangerous to mankind than any other living person today. His name is Zbigniew Brzezinski, a CFR-member , Arch-Trilateral Commissionist, Bilderberger. He has been the evil spirit behind 5 US presidents, including Obama – and he is obsessed with but one thought: The US is to dominate a communist one world state. For that purpose, he sees Eurasia as his grand chessboard, where the battle is to be won. Like any chessplayer, he starts by occupupying the centre of the chessboard, Central Asia. He wants peace there, friendly arrangements, in particular with China, if possible, so that he can pursue the goal of his obsession, i.e the purpose of the Trilateral Commission created by him and David Rockefeller: To create a world state by fusing a coming North American Union, at which he is working…

View original post 2,682 more words

the real Syrian Free Press

*

OSCURATI DA NILESAT I CANALI TELEVISIVI SIRIANI

5 settembre 2012 – Damasco – Dopo il grande successo dei media siriani nell’affrontare il feroce attacco, armato e mediatico, contro la Siria, i ministri arabi hanno concordato con l’amministrazione del satellite NileSat di sospendere completamente la diffusione dei canali televisivi satellitari siriani dalla piattaforma di NileSat.

Il ministero dell’informazione ha condannato la sospensione da parte di Nilesat della diffusione dei canali televisivi satellitari siriani, considerando questo atteggiamento un “allineamento al progetto ostile alla Siria, alla nazione e al popolo”.

Nell’ambito della campagna mediatica contro la Siria, in un’azione unilaterale in contrasto con i termini del contratto stabilito, Nilesat ha sospeso la diffusione dei canale televisivi satellitari siriani, e questo tipo di atteggiamento da parte di Nilesat viola le regole deontologiche dei media e trasgredisce in modo volgare ed ingiustificabile le norme ed i principi dell’azione dei media”.

Tutto ciò è la…

View original post 116 more words

the real Syrian Free Press

*

Syria – Video Nouvelles – FRA – 05 Septembre 2012

Bashar al-Jaafari: “Groupes terroristes alimentés par des parties internationales”.

Published on Sep 5, 2012 by Le Journal de la Syrie

  1. * Jaafari appelle toutes les parties ayant une influence sur les groupes terroristes armés à coopérer avec al-Ibrahimi pour assurer le succès de sa mission en Syrie
  2. * Nos forces armées poursuivent la traque des terroristes à Seif al-Dawleh à Alep
  3. * La Chine a réaffirmé que la solution politique est la seule voie pour régler la crise en Syrie.

*

Сирия – видео новости – В лингва Русса – 05 сентябрь 2012

*

*

Uploaded by Le Journal de la Syrie on September 2012

Recorded from Syrian Television

Supported bySyrianFreePressNewtwork  &  TG24Siria

at http://syrianfreepress.wordpress.com/

http://syrianfreepress.wordpress.com/2012/09/05/syrian-video-nouvelles-francais-05-september-2012-bashar-al-jaafari-groupes-terroristes-alimentes-par-des-parties-internationales/

*

Français

*

View original post

What is freedom ?

Freedom is something around which all of us should be able to rally. Freedom is something that ought to be a universal agreement by individuals everywhere that freedom is a shared, sacred ideal. Something that is valuable, and, as a matter of fact invaluable in the lives of people. But yet freedom doesn’t seem to be understood. It seems to be misunderstood. It seems to get mistreated, shoved in the back corner, abused and tortured !Or worse ,in the name of freedom people kill

other people,torture and behead because this is the way they understand it! The political freedom wants to build its monument on a grave filled with the bodies of whoever opposes it!
For a long period of time, all the way back to when kings ruled over people, people have believed that freedom was something granted by others. Kings were able to do to almost anything they wanted because people believed that it was their right, and that they should be happy with whatever freedoms the monarchy granted. Strange …these days the same kings ask for freedom in other sovereign countries!And their slaves are doing their Imperialist work!
There are 3 types of freedom:
1) and the most important,I think: Spiritual freedom, where you are free to believe what you want and in what you want! Are modern freedom seekers allowing it? NO! IF YOU DO NOT SHARE THEIR BELIEVES THEY CONSIDER YOU KUFFER (SINNER) AND SO THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO SLAUGHTER YOU AND YOUR FAMILY!

2)Economic freedom is where you are free to spend your money on what you value most. DID WE HAVE IT IN SYRIA?YES! THE RIGHT FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY AND INVESTMENT FOR EVERY SYRIAN CITIZEN PROTECTED AGAINST ANY ATTEMPT OF ZIONIST BANKS AND CORPORATE TO STEAL IT! SO ?
2.1)THERE ARE SOME UGLY THINGS CALLED “TAXES” AND WHICH CAN ENSLAVE YOU FASTER THAN ANYTHING! DO THIS “FREEDOM” PARASITES KNOW WHAT THEY ASK FOR?AND THAT IN SYRIA THE PEOPLE WERE AMONG THE HAPPIEST TAX PAYERS IN THIS WORLD?
3) Political freedom is where you are free to do what you want, and go where you want!TO BE REPRESENTED BY WHO YOU WANT!
3.1)LET’S SUPPOSE SOME OF THE SYRIANS WERE NOT HAPPY ABOUT MR.PRESIDENT ASSAD REPRESENTING THEM(IGNORING THE MILLIONS WHO WENT OUT IN SUPPORT MANIFESTATIONS) THE REFORM BROUGHT THEM THE VOTE!WHY DIDN’T THEY USE IT?WHY DO THEY WANT TO STEAL THE FREEDOM OF THE OTHERS BY IMPOSING THEIR BARBARIAN LAW?
3.2) HOW CAN A PERSON BE FREE IN A COUNTRY WHICH REPRESENT THE TOTAL OF THE SLAVES BOWING TO A FOREIGN POWER?

The only way to be truly free is to have all 3!!!!!AND NOW THEY HAVE IT BUT THEY DREAM TO BE THE SLAVES!

%d bloggers like this: